Skip to main content
Tenders

UOW989 Woodbury Building Boiler Replacement

Open
Deadline
28 days left
April 24, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026856-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 17, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 24, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 17, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
4 months
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The University of Worcester is seeking a supplier to Relocate the boiler room to a new plant space. Install new heating boilers and modification of services to route away from the new space. Addition of new 'Wing' heating control zones and reuse of pumps, calorifiers etc. where possible

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Relocate the boiler room to a new plant space.
--Install new heating boilers.
--Modification of services to route away from the new space.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a reasonable process, but lacks transparency regarding financial value and evaluation criteria, and has limited sustainability considerations.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and an open competition procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable given the scope, though the submission deadline is relatively short. No disputes are reported. The procedure is below threshold, implying simplified regulations.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required works is clear and specific, detailing the relocation, installation, and modification of heating systems. Technical requirements are well-defined, outlining the core tasks. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference, organization, and CPV code is present. The contract duration and start date are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available for review, impacting overall completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, promoting broad participation. Requirements are technical and objective, not tailored to specific companies. The value is classified, which reduces transparency. The lack of disclosed evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, but the overall process is open.

Value classified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract duration and start date. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the availability of document URLs is not confirmed. Financing information is also absent, which could hinder potential bidders.

No e-submission mentioned
Financing information absent
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, CPV, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The timeline appears consistent with the project scope.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical requirements
Open competition procedure
Well-defined CPV code and NUTS code
Active status with clear timeline

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available for review
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value for greater transparency.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to guide bidders and ensure a fair assessment.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline