Skip to main content
Tenders

Sanitary servicing of public toilets in Saulkrasti

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168587
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Tender Opening

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Pieriga
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€336,807
Avg. Bids
2.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
3,844 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Sanitary servicing of public toilets in Saulkrasti

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija' and 'Nolikums']
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Details to be found in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija']

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168587_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318160726.pdf -- 95.9 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the sanitary servicing of public toilets in Saulkrasti, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other necessary documents.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_SKS 2026_01 tualešu apsaimniekošanai... -- 2.4 MB

This document contains the regulations for a tender concerning the sanitary servicing of public toilets in Saulkrasti, outlining the procurement subject, client, evaluation criteria, and submission procedures.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for a public procurement tender (SKS 2026/01) for the sanitary servicing of public toilets in Saulkrasti, Latvia, with a submission deadline of April 2, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for sanitary servicing of public toilets in Saulkrasti is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable deadline. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard procurement procedures with a clear CPV code and an open competition type. Deadlines appear reasonable. The primary concern is the lack of explicitly stated evaluation criteria, which could impact legal compliance if not detailed in the referenced documents.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key requirements are referenced in attached documents, which is a standard practice. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria within the main notice reduces overall clarity for potential bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is missing, impacting the completeness of the financial and operational aspects.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The reference to specific documents for requirements is standard. The main concern for fairness is the potential for restricted document access, as flagged, and the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which could lead to perceived bias.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of a direct URL for document submission and the missing contract start date and financing information limit the practicality for bidders.

No e-submission (direct URL)
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which are increasingly important in public tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided
E-Procurement utilized
Key documents referenced

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access
Missing contract duration

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Clearly state evaluation criteria within the tender notice or ensure full document access for all potential bidders.
3. Include contract duration and start date for better planning.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline