Provision of support services in the form of specialized advice and supervision within the project "Support for the de-institutionalization of substitute care in the Poznań sub-region"

This tender for specialized advisory and supervision services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered short given the complexity of the project. The procedure type is not explicitly stated as 'None', which could be a minor point of ambiguity.

The title and description of the services are clear. The scope of work, including the base hours and option for additional hours, is specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. A significant number of documents are attached, suggesting a comprehensive set of tender materials. However, crucial details regarding eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are not explicitly summarized, requiring bidders to delve into the attached documents.

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting transparency. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for selection are not explicitly tailored to specific companies. The deadlines are provided, and the process appears objective, although the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be a concern.

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting an electronic submission process. The contract duration and start date (implied by the submission deadline and contract duration) are present. However, the lack of explicit information on financing and the absence of a clear e-submission portal link or detailed submission instructions reduce its practicality.

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.