Skip to main content
Tenders

UWQ340 St Johns Campus Resurfacing and Repairs

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
017685-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 05, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
2 months
Location
Herefordshire, Worcestershire and Warwickshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The University is seeking a contractor, to undertake all works in connection with resurfacing and repair work to the main road through the St John’s Campus.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear basic information and requirements, but lacks transparency in financial details and specific evaluation criteria. The short submission deadline and absence of e-submission are notable drawbacks.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and CPV code. However, the absence of a reveal date for documents and unspecified evaluation criteria could pose minor compliance risks. The deadline is noted as potentially short, which could impact legal fairness if it prevents adequate preparation.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear and concise. The AI-extracted requirements outline the necessary categories for submission. However, the lack of specific evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to fully understand how their submissions will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and a description. Deadlines and contract duration are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the content of the tender documents is not available, hindering a complete assessment of the tender's scope.

Value not disclosed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. Requirements are categorized, and the value is classified (though not disclosed). The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which could lead to perceived bias. The absence of e-submission might also be a barrier for some.

No evaluation criteria specified
No e-submission
Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are provided. However, the absence of an e-submission option and the lack of explicit financing information reduce the practicality for potential bidders. The short submission deadline also impacts practicality.

No e-submission
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logically sequenced, with the contract start date following the submission deadline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which are increasingly important in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of emphasis on these areas.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Specific CPV code provided
Description of works is clear
Submission deadline and contract duration specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
No e-submission option
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Consider implementing an e-submission system for greater efficiency and accessibility.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline