Total advisory services for the renovation of Lærkeskolen in Egedal Municipality

This tender for total advisory services for the renovation of Lærkeskolen is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a defined scope. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and potentially practicality.

The tender follows an open procedure and utilizes a standard CPV code. Deadlines are provided, and the process appears regulatory compliant. No disputes are indicated. The submission deadline is relatively short given the complexity and value of the project, which could be a minor concern for legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines.

The description of the required services is detailed, outlining the phases and specific tasks expected from the total advisor. The requirements for technical capability are also clearly extracted. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code. The description provides a good overview of the project scope and phases. However, crucial details such as the contract duration and the specific content of the tender documents are not fully accessible or specified, impacting overall completeness.

The tender is an open procedure, ensuring broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility and technical capability are objective and based on the project's needs. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies.

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is practical. However, the lack of explicit information on contract start date and duration, along with the absence of readily accessible full tender document content, reduces practicality. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and submission deadline are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of an active tender.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. While the project involves renovation, which can have sustainability implications, these are not highlighted as specific requirements or evaluation criteria. The mention of EU funding is absent.