Skip to main content
Tenders

Procurement of Pest Control Services — Cadarn Housing Group (PRO 023)

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
025246-2026
Value
£171,600
Location
West Wales and The Valleys, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
£171,600
Duration
24 months
Location
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Cadarn Housing Group invites tenders for reactive pest control services across its residential housing portfolio in South and Mid Wales. Services cover approximately 5,000 properties, including rodent control, insect and seasonal pest treatments, and wasp nest removal, with response categories: Priority 1 (24-hour), Priority 2 (48-hour), and Standard (5 working days). The contract includes minor enabling works and optional consultancy. Awarded based on Most Advantageous Tender (MAT) with quality (40%) and price (60%) criteria. Initial term of two years with a one-year extension option. Estimated total value £143,000 over three years.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

15 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (7)
Technical (1)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Tenders must be submitted via the Sell2Wales Postbox.
--Tenders must be submitted by the deadline stated in the tender documentation.
--The full tender pack, including the Pricing Schedule and Draft Contract, is available to download from this notice.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Must be able to provide reactive pest control services.
--Must be able to cover rodent control, insect and seasonal pest treatments, and wasp nest removal.
--Must be able to provide attendance across three response categories: Priority 1 (24-hour), Priority 2 (48-hour) and Standard (5 working days).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The full tender pack, including the Specification, is available to download.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The estimated total contract value is approximately £143,000 over the full three-year term.
--The contract will be awarded on the basis of the Most Advantageous Tender (MAT), assessed against quality (40%) and price (60%) criteria.
--A minimum quality threshold of 60% applies.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for pest control services is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a defined evaluation process. However, it lacks explicit sustainability considerations and the availability of detailed document content upfront is limited.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal compliance by providing a reference number, organization details, a clear description, a submission deadline, estimated value, and CPV code. The procedure is identified as 'Below threshold - open competition', which is appropriate for the estimated value. No disputes are reported. The deadline appears reasonable given the scope.

Clarity80/100

The description of services required is detailed and specific, outlining the types of pest control, property types, and response time categories. The award criterion (MAT based on 40% quality and 60% price) and a minimum quality threshold are mentioned, enhancing clarity. However, specific evaluation criteria within the quality component are not detailed in this summary.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, description, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the actual content of the tender documents (Specification, Pricing Schedule, Assessment Methodology, Draft Contract) is not directly available or summarized in this overview, hindering a full assessment of completeness.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is open competition, promoting fairness. The award is based on the Most Advantageous Tender (MAT) with clear weighting for quality and price, and a minimum quality threshold. The full tender pack is available for download, ensuring potential bidders have access to necessary information. There are no indications of requirements tailored to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

Submission is via Sell2Wales Postbox, which is a standard e-procurement platform. The contract start date is specified. However, the prompt notes 'No e-submission' which is contradictory to the mention of Sell2Wales Postbox, suggesting a potential misunderstanding or missing detail. Financing information is not explicitly detailed beyond the estimated value.

No e-submission (potentially contradictory to Sell2Wales Postbox mention)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration and start dates are logically presented. No suspension or disputes are indicated, contributing to data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability within the procurement process.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear service description and scope
Well-defined award criteria (MAT, quality/price split)
Open competition procedure
Available tender documents for download

Concerns

Lack of explicit sustainability criteria
No detailed evaluation criteria provided in summary
Limited availability of document content upfront

Recommendations

1. Provide more specific details on the quality evaluation criteria.
2. Incorporate sustainability considerations into future tenders.
3. Ensure full document content is readily accessible or summarized.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline