Skip to main content
Tenders

Renovation of the state-significant watercourse Lēpju strauts, land reclamation cadastre number 381664:01, from km 00/00 to 52/73 in Džūkste parish, Tukums municipality

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168468
Value
€91,422
Location
Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€91,422
Duration
Not specified
Location
Latvia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Renovation of the state-significant watercourse Lēpju strauts, land reclamation cadastre number 381664:01, from km 00/00 to 52/73 in Džūkste parish, Tukums municipality
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements provided in the text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

10.pielikumsXLS
10.pielikums_Būvdarbu izpildes grafiks_VNŪ Lē... -- 12.9 KB

This document contains a construction work execution schedule for the restoration of the Lēpju stream water drainage in Džūkste parish, Tukums municipality.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168468_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319051337.pdf -- 97.2 KB

This document contains the tender requirements for the restoration of state-significant watercourses, including selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and other necessary documents.

1.pielikumsXLS
1.pielikums_VNŪ Lēpju strauts.xlsx -- 22.3 KB

This document contains a financial offer form, specifically a local estimate for the restoration of state-significant watercourses in Latvia.

NolikumsDOC
Konkursa nolikums_VNŪ Lēpju strauts_būvdarbi_... -- 226.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender concerning the restoration of the state-significant watercourse Lēpju strauts in Džūkste parish, Tukums municipality.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the restoration of state-level watercourses in Džūkste parish, Tukums municipality, with a deadline for submitting offers on April 20, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for watercourse restoration is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting fairness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a clear procedure and proper CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and there are no reported disputes. The procedure is open, suggesting regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the existence of specific documents for requirements is indicated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria in the provided text reduces overall clarity for bidders.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the AI-extracted requirements section indicates that specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are not explicitly detailed in the provided text, impacting completeness.

Missing specific eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements in AI-extracted section
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and uses an e-procurement system. Deadlines are reasonable. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue flags a potential fairness concern, as full document access is crucial for objective evaluation.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate a lack of explicit information regarding e-submission details, contract start date, and financing, which are important for practical planning.

No explicit e-submission details
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. Dates appear logical.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded,' which often implies adherence to certain sustainability standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided text.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Reasonable deadlines and value disclosure
Active e-procurement system
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed eligibility and capability requirements in AI-extracted section
Limited sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Clarify evaluation criteria and ensure full document access for all potential bidders.
2. Provide more detailed information on eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.
3. Incorporate explicit sustainability aspects if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline