Skip to main content
Tenders

Provision of Alternative Education (Angling) to Respect Collaboration Trust

Open
Deadline
33 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028121-2026
Value
£600,000
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Contract Start Date

September 01, 2026

Budget
£600,000
Duration
11 months
Location
Derbyshire and Nottinghamshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of Alternative Education (Angling) to Respect Collaboration Trust. The Trust (“RCT”) has a statutory duty to make arrangements for the provision of appropriate education otherwise than at school, for children of compulsory school age who, by reason of suspension or exclusion from school or otherwise, will not receive a suitable education without these arrangements

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for alternative education services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a specified CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is within a typical range for open procedures. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, outlining the statutory duty and the target group. The AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of expected submission components. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria hinders a complete understanding of how proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the critical absence of content for the tender documents significantly impacts completeness, as potential bidders cannot fully assess the scope and requirements.

No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender appears fair, with a disclosed value and an open procedure. The requirements listed (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) are standard and objective. There is no indication of tailoring to specific companies.

Practicality65/100

The tender is hampered by the lack of e-submission and the unavailability of document content, making it less practical for bidders. While a contract start date and duration are provided, the financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported suspensions or disputes, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these modern procurement considerations.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
Open procedure with standard requirement categories

Concerns

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of e-submission functionality
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Provide full content for all tender documents.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Consider implementing an e-submission process for improved efficiency.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline