Skip to main content
Tenders

Maintenance of green areas of Jelgava City Municipality

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
165699
Value
€1,000,000
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
lowest total sum of unit pricesPrice
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Tender Opening

April 20, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€1,000,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Zemgale
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€188,684
Avg. Bids
7.9
Competition
High
SME Winners
100%
7,851 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Maintenance of green areas of Jelgava City Municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Offers must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-20T09:00:00.
--The tender is for the maintenance of greenery in Jelgava.
--The framework agreement duration is 36 months or until the sum of concluded contracts reaches the specified agreement price, whichever comes first.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds provided in the summary.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must submit offers with the lowest total sum of unit prices.
--Framework agreement will be concluded with five bidders with the lowest total sum of unit prices.
--If fewer than five bidders submit offers or fewer than five bidders meet the procurement procedure requirements, the agreement will be concluded with all bidders whose offers meet the regulations.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements provided in the summary.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements provided in the summary.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
165699_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318052123.pdf -- 98.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders in a tender for the maintenance of greenery in Jelgava city municipality, detailing qualification criteria, technical specifications, and financial proposal requirements.

Nolikuma 5.pielikums “Vispārīgās vienošanās projekts” ar pielikumiemDOC
5_piel_VV_ar_pielikumiem.docx -- 86.2 KB

This document contains a draft framework agreement for the maintenance of green spaces in Jelgava, outlining the procedure for selecting contractors through price offers and subsequent contract execution.

NolikumsPDF
Nolikums_8_AK.pdf -- 311.9 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the maintenance of green spaces in Jelgava, including details on the procurement subject, submission requirements, and deadlines.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open competition procurement for the maintenance of greenery in Jelgava, with a deadline for proposal submission on April 20, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for greenery maintenance in Jelgava is generally well-structured with clear financial information and a reasonable timeline. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and has restricted document access, impacting transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure. Deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. No disputes are noted. The procedure is open, indicating regulatory compliance.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the requirements are documented in the provided attachments. The conditions for concluding the framework agreement are specified, although evaluation criteria are missing.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. However, the AI-extracted requirements indicate that specific technical and financial capability requirements are not detailed in the summary, and the 'tender documents' section implies some documents might not be fully accessible or detailed.

Missing specific technical capability requirements in summary
Missing specific financial requirements in summary
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed. The selection of five bidders based on the lowest unit prices is an objective criterion. E-procurement is utilized. However, restricted document access is a concern for full fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. The contract duration and start date (implied by reveal date) are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and while e-submission is implied by e-procurement, it's not explicitly stated as a requirement in the AI-extracted points.

Financing information not explicitly detailed
E-submission not explicitly stated as a requirement
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. Dates are logical, with the reveal date preceding the submission and opening dates.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear financial information and estimated value
Reasonable timeline and contract duration
Use of e-procurement
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Restricted document access
Lack of sustainability considerations (green, social, innovation)
Technical and financial capability requirements not detailed in summary

Recommendations

1. Provide clear and detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline