Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Dartford Town Centre - Westgate Village Development - Construction Works

Open
Deadline
218 days left
November 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028307-2026
Value
£30,000,000
Location
Kent, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

October 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

November 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

November 01, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£30,000,000
Duration
42 months
Location
Kent
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Council intends to procure the main building contractor for the Westgate Village Development. The Project and development site area incorporates the former Co-op land and property with the buildings demolished with exception of the retained façade and partial building facing Spital Street; this extends for the purpose of the Planning Application to incorporate Orchard Street and the public highway in Spital Street where it is proposed that there are improvements and amendments to the Adopted Highway. The council acquired the land and property from Homes England in June 2022 and in 2023, following a competitive process appointed Peter Barber Architects to prepare a Feasibility Study to explore the options available in land use. A scheme was approved by the Council in 2024 that has been advanced to a Planning Application that was Validated in January 2026. The project incorporates the following: 1.69 homes in buildings (Blocks A-G) up to 4 storeys 2.20% Affordable Housing (as Planning Policy) 3.Approximately 20,000ft2 commercial (Class E Space) 4.Redevelopment of the former Co-op building to provide entertainment uses (Approximately 8,500ft2) 5.Public Realm 6.Improvement to Orchard Street Adopted Highway.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

14 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (9)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-11-01T00:00:00+00:00.
--Bids must be provided in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Must be a main building contractor.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Experience in similar large-scale development projects.
--Ability to manage a project with a value of 30,000,000 EUR.
--Ability to deliver a project with a duration of 42 months.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the Westgate Village Development construction works is generally well-structured with a clear description and estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financial requirements, impacting its completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles, including a clear CPV code and a competitive flexible procedure. The estimated value is disclosed, and the organization is identified. However, the submission deadline of November 1, 2026, for a contract starting on the same date might be considered tight, potentially impacting legal compliance regarding reasonable timelines. The absence of a reveal date for the tender documents is a minor procedural issue.

Submission deadline may be too short relative to contract start date.
Clarity80/100

The description of the Westgate Village Development is detailed, outlining the scope of works including residential, commercial, entertainment, public realm, and highway improvements. The technical capability requirements are also reasonably well-defined, indicating the type of experience sought. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. The description is comprehensive. However, crucial details such as specific financial requirements for bidders and the content of the tender documents are missing, which affects the overall completeness of the information provided to potential bidders.

No document content available.
No specific financial requirements detailed.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the estimated value is disclosed, promoting transparency. The requirements for technical capability are objective and related to the project scope. The procedure is competitive. However, the lack of available document content and unspecified evaluation criteria could be perceived as less fair, as bidders may not have full insight into the assessment process. The requirement for bids in multiple languages (English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian) is unusual for a UK-based tender and could be seen as an unnecessary barrier or tailored to specific entities if not justified.

Bids must be provided in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, and Lithuanian (unusual for UK tender).
No document content available.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies an estimated value, contract duration, and contract start date. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and the URL for documents limits the practicality for bidders. The financing information is not detailed, which is a standard component for large projects.

No e-submission mentioned.
Document URL not provided.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided (submission deadline and contract start) are logically consistent, although the short interval is noted. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear and detailed project description.
Estimated value and contract duration specified.
Appropriate CPV code provided.
Open procedure with competitive flexible process.

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria.
No document content available.
Unusual multi-language bid requirement.
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Make tender documents readily accessible with clear URLs.
3. Clarify or justify the multi-language bid requirement.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline