Skip to main content
Tenders

Selection of catering service provider for Kindergarten No. 146 Wyspa Dzieci in Wrocław

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00171148/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Dolnośląskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
10 months
Location
Dolnośląskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€779,692
Avg. Bids
0.3
Competition
Low
SME Winners
83%
2,709 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Selection of catering service provider for Kindergarten No. 146 Wyspa Dzieci in Wrocław

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information on mandatory exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on eligibility requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on technical capability requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information on financial requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8a64-3ef3-78fb-056e-e50001aab6c2.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the selection of a catering service provider for Kindergarten No. 146 'Wyspa Dzieci' in Wrocław, Poland, with offers to be submitted electronically.

SWZ-P146-2026.pdfPDF
SWZ-P146-2026.pdf

This document contains the Specifications of the Contract Requirements (SWZ) for the selection of a catering service provider for Preschool No. 146 "Wyspa Dzieci" in Wrocław.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for catering services at a kindergarten in Wrocław is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and an e-procurement process. However, it lacks crucial details regarding evaluation criteria and financial requirements, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements, including a proper CPV code and a clear procedure indicated by 'None' (likely meaning a standard, non-complex procedure). Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline appears short relative to the contract duration. No disputes are flagged. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear, and the main document (SWZ) is identified. The CPV code is specific. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria creates ambiguity for potential bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and critical details such as mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are missing from the AI-extracted sections, suggesting they might be buried within the attached documents or are entirely absent.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The value is not disclosed, which can be a concern for transparency. The absence of specified evaluation criteria means bidders cannot objectively assess how their offers will be judged, potentially leading to subjective evaluations. The short submission deadline also raises questions about fairness.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is a positive for practical submission. A contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, but the duration is given. Financing information is absent. The short submission deadline impacts practicality for bidders.

Contract start date not specified
Financing information not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and CPV code are populated. Dates are logical, with the submission deadline preceding the contract duration. No suspensions or disputes are indicated.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and location specified
CPV code provided
E-procurement utilized
Key documents attached

Concerns

Missing crucial evaluation criteria
Estimated value not disclosed
Lack of detail on exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract for transparency.
3. Provide detailed information on all mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline