Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Design and Fit-out of a Hub in the High Street

Open
Deadline
9 days left
April 12, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028464-2026
Value
£120,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 05, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 12, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 03, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£120,000
Duration
4 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Littlehampton Town Council is seeking to appoint a suitably qualified and experienced Contractor to provide a comprehensive internal design and fit-out service in respect of the proposed Hub on the High Street. The appointed Contractor will be responsible for delivering the project from an empty shell condition through to a fully completed, compliant, and operational space ready for occupation and use.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

40 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (34)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Tenderers will be required to propose a realistic programme for design, mobilisation, and completion of works.
--Tenderers must demonstrate cost control mechanisms.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Suitably qualified and experienced Contractor.
--Capable of providing an integrated design and build solution.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS34
--Develop a comprehensive internal design proposal aligned with Council's objectives for inclusivity, accessibility, flexibility, and community use.
--Produce detailed space planning layouts for multi-functional use.
--Incorporate inclusive design principles and ensure compliance with Equality Act 2010 and applicable Building Regulations.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Deliver the project within the agreed contract sum.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the design and fit-out of a community hub is generally well-structured, with a clear scope of services and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting overall transparency and accessibility.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements by providing a clear procedure, CPV code, and organizational details. The estimated value and contract duration are specified. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and potential for a short submission deadline (though not flagged as per rules) could be areas for improvement in ensuring full regulatory compliance and fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The description of services is comprehensive, detailing both design and fit-out requirements with specific elements. The objectives for inclusivity, accessibility, and community use are clearly articulated. The requirements for the completed hub are also well-defined.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. The scope of services is detailed. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria mean that crucial details for tenderers are missing.

No document content available
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the requirements are described objectively without apparent tailoring to specific companies. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria makes it difficult for bidders to understand how their submissions will be assessed, potentially impacting fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies an estimated value and contract duration. However, it does not explicitly mention e-submission, and the URL for documents is not provided. Financing information is also absent. The contract start date is provided, but the lack of e-submission and document access points reduces practical usability.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and CPV code are populated. The dates provided for the submission deadline and contract start are logical in sequence. There are no indications of suspension or disputes.

Sustainability50/100

While the description mentions 'good environmental practice' and 'energy-efficient solutions', there are no explicit requirements for green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. The tender is not indicated as EU funded, limiting the potential for integrated sustainability goals.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear and comprehensive scope of services
Objective requirements without apparent company tailoring
Open procedure type
Detailed description of expected outcomes

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No document content available
Lack of explicit e-submission details
Limited sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Publish clear evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Provide direct links to all tender documents for ease of access.
3. Consider incorporating more specific sustainability and social value objectives.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline