Skip to main content
Tenders

"Podzamcze, Ogrodzieniec Castle (14th century) – renovation of perimeter walls, V stage" sections 1 and 2

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00167707/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

"Podzamcze, Ogrodzieniec Castle (14th century) – renovation of perimeter walls, V stage" sections 1 and 2

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

8 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de88fb-bc0d-3207-056e-e50001aaa019.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for construction works related to the renovation of the outer walls of Ogrodzieniec Castle, Phase V, sections 1 and 2, issued by the Municipality of Ogrodzieniec.

23.03.2026 zał. nr 1 do SWZ - PPU.docxDOC
23.03.2026 zał. nr 1 do SWZ - PPU.docx

This document contains the draft contract for the conservation and renovation of the outer walls of the Ogrodzieniec Castle in Podzamcze, Stage V, sections 1 and 2.

23.03.2026 zał. nr 2 do SWZ - Formularz ofertowy.docxDOC
23.03.2026 zał. nr 2 do SWZ - Formularz ofert...

This document contains the offer form for the public procurement of renovation works for the perimeter walls of Ogrodzieniec Castle, section 1 and 2.

23.03.2026 zał. nr 3 do SWZ - Ośw. dot. wykluczenia.docxDOC
23.03.2026 zał. nr 3 do SWZ - Ośw. dot. wyklu...

This document is a bidder's declaration concerning grounds for exclusion from the public procurement procedure for the renovation of the Ogrodzieniec Castle walls.

23.03.2026 zał. nr 4 do SWZ - Ośw. dot. warunków udziału.docxDOC
23.03.2026 zał. nr 4 do SWZ - Ośw. dot. warun...

This document contains a bidder's declaration confirming their fulfillment of participation conditions for the public procurement tender concerning the renovation of the Ogrodzieniec Castle perimeter walls.

23.03.2026 zał. nr 5 do SWZ - Wykaz robót.docxDOC
23.03.2026 zał. nr 5 do SWZ - Wykaz robót.doc...

This document is a template for listing construction works performed by the bidder within the last 5 years, required for the tender "Podzamcze, Ogrodzieniec Castle (XIV) – perimeter wall renovation, Stage V", sections 1 and 2.

23.03.2026 zał. nr 6 do SWZ - Wykaz osób.docxDOC
23.03.2026 zał. nr 6 do SWZ - Wykaz osób.docx

This document contains a list of individuals to be assigned by the contractor for the public procurement project concerning the renovation of the Ogrodzieniec Castle perimeter walls.

23.03.2026 zał. nr 8 do SWZ - Wytyczne do sporządzania kosztorysów.pdfPDF
23.03.2026 zał. nr 8 do SWZ - Wytyczne do spo...

This document contains guidelines for preparing tender, replacement, and post-completion cost estimates for the "Podzamcze, Ogrodzieniec Castle (XIV) – perimeter wall renovation, V stage" project, focusing on eligible expenditures for heritage protection funding.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the renovation of Ogrodzieniec Castle's perimeter walls is generally well-structured, with most essential documents provided. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code, a reference number, and a defined procedure. The deadlines appear reasonable for the scope, and no disputes are noted. However, the absence of a 'reveal date' and explicit evaluation criteria could be a minor compliance concern.

Missing reveal date
No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, description, and CPV code. Essential documents like the offer form, draft contract, and technical guidelines are available. However, the lack of explicit eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements in the AI-extracted section reduces overall clarity.

AI-extracted requirements section is empty
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, and a clear description of the works. The contract duration is specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and the AI-extracted requirements are missing, which affects the completeness of the tender documentation.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
AI-extracted requirements section is empty
Fairness85/100

The tender is characterized as E-Procurement, promoting accessibility. All documents are available for download. The value is not disclosed, which is a minor concern for transparency. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, indicating a good level of fairness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes E-Procurement, which is positive. However, the absence of explicit financing information and a clear contract start date (implied by submission deadline and duration) reduces practicality. The deadline, while active, might be tight given the scope and the need for detailed cost estimation.

Financing information not specified
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. The CPV code is provided, and the contract duration is logical. No disputes or suspensions are noted, contributing to high data consistency.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. This lack of sustainability considerations results in a moderate score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

E-Procurement enabled
Comprehensive set of required documents provided
Clear description of works and CPV code
Active status and reference number

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Potential for a tight submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract for greater transparency.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Incorporate sustainability aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline