Skip to main content
Tenders

Systems and Behaviour Framework

Open
Deadline
35 days left
May 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
027369-2026
Value
£2,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 25, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 01, 2026

Budget
£2,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Zero Waste Scotland (the ‘Client’) requires the provision of integrated systems analysis and behavioural science expertise to identify leverage points within complex systems and to design, prioritise, test, and scale interventions that address clearly defined target behaviours

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Provision of integrated systems analysis expertise.
--Provision of behavioural science expertise.
--Ability to identify leverage points within complex systems.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Systems and Behaviour Framework is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are present, though their reasonableness is subjective without further context. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on available information.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required services is clear, outlining the need for systems analysis and behavioural science expertise. Technical capability requirements are well-defined, though submission requirements are not detailed.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and deadline. However, crucial details such as contract duration and specific evaluation criteria are missing, reducing overall completeness.

Missing contract duration
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is open, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies, suggesting a good level of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as e-procurement, which is positive. However, the lack of a specified contract start date and duration, along with the absence of financing information, hinders practical assessment. The availability of documents is noted, but their content is not summarized.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender's active status.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. While EU funding is not specified, the absence of these elements limits the sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of services
Disclosed estimated value
Open procedure with e-procurement
Presence of reference number and title

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Include contract duration and start date for better practical assessment.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline