Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of forest road in Jelgava Forest District

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
168422
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Financial proposalsPrice
Applicant experienceExperience
Technical resourcesTechnical
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Latvia
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of forest road in Jelgava Forest District

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

10 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-07T10:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in the specified format.
--Bids must include all required documentation as outlined in the tender documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as defined by applicable law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--Bidders must possess the necessary permits and licenses to perform the works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate relevant experience in forest road reconstruction projects.
--Bidders must provide details of their technical resources, including equipment and personnel.
--Bidders must submit applicant experience forms.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must submit financial proposals.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

10.pielikums - Līguma projektsDOC
10_piel_Nolikumam_MPS2026_27_Liguma_projekts.... -- 86.1 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the reconstruction of a forest road in Jelgava municipality, outlining the scope of work, payment terms, and price indexation procedures.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168422_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318150002.pdf -- 96.2 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a tender for the reconstruction of a forest road in the Jelgava forest district, including submission forms for applicant experience, technical resources, and financial proposals.

NolikumsDOC
NOLIKUMS_MPS2026_27_cela_parbuve_Kalsnavas_pa... -- 53.0 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure concerning the reconstruction of a forest road in the Jelgava region, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open competition tender for the reconstruction of a forest road in the Jelgava region, with the submission deadline for proposals set for April 7, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for forest road reconstruction is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and includes a CPV code. Deadlines appear reasonable, and the tender is active. No disputes are reported. The primary concern is the lack of disclosed financial value, which can impact legal compliance regarding transparency.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the AI-extracted requirements provide a good overview of what is expected. The tender documents are available and appear to contain necessary information. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leads to some ambiguity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. The duration of the tender validity is specified. However, the estimated financial value is missing, and the contract duration is not explicitly stated in the basic information, though it can be inferred from the contract draft.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The AI-extracted requirements are objective. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests potential issues with full document accessibility for all potential bidders, which is a significant fairness concern.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates that the submission process might not be fully electronic, which is a drawback. The contract start date is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates appear logical, with reveal date preceding submission and opening dates. The tender validity period is also specified.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender information. This indicates a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of works
Open competition procedure
E-Procurement characteristic
Reasonable submission deadline
CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Restricted document access
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly specify the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline