Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.
Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.
LoginUpgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.
Login37 requirements across 5 categories
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.
LoginThis tender for lift refurbishment consultancy offers a detailed scope of work and clear project stages, but lacks explicit evaluation criteria and accessible tender documents, impacting overall quality.
The tender generally adheres to legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a defined procedure. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and the potential for a short submission deadline (relative to the project's complexity) are noted concerns. The contract start date coinciding with the submission deadline is a significant procedural anomaly.
The description of works is comprehensive, detailing the project's objectives, phases (RIBA Stages), and the expected roles of the consultant, including Principal Designer (CDM). Requirements are well-documented and specific to the lift refurbishment context.
Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. However, the lack of accessible tender documents and the absence of specific submission requirements are significant omissions.
The tender appears fair with a disclosed estimated value and objective criteria implied through the detailed scope of work. The procedure is competitive. The lack of specific company tailoring is positive. However, the absence of accessible tender documents limits full access for all potential bidders.
The tender specifies a contract duration and estimated value. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the contract start date coinciding with the submission deadline present practical challenges.
Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and duration are populated. The dates provided are logical, with the exception of the contract start date aligning with the submission deadline, which is a critical inconsistency.
The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, which are standard considerations in modern public tenders.
Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis
No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes
Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.
Hello! I'm your AI assistant for this tender. I can help you understand requirements, deadlines, eligibility criteria, and provide strategic insights.
No credit card required