Skip to main content
Tenders

UKRI-5619 Chiller and Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) Maintenance

Open
Deadline
31 days left
April 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026038-2026
Value
£1,032,000
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 19, 2026

Budget
£1,032,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Berkshire, Buckinghamshire and Oxfordshire
Type
Open Procedure
73
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This procurement aims to contract with a specialist supplier for all Chiller & Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) Maintenance, Remedials & Reactive, Projects & Associated Services across STFC Estates.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Specialist supplier to complete all Chiller & Air Source Heat Pump (ASHP) Maintenance, Remedials & Reactive, Projects & Associated Services across STFC Estates.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

73
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for chiller and ASHP maintenance is moderately complete and fair, but lacks specific details on technical and financial requirements, and sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear procedure and CPV code. Deadlines are present, though the submission deadline relative to the contract start date could be tight. No disputes are reported.

Clarity70/100

The description outlines the general scope of work, but crucial details regarding specific technical capabilities, eligibility criteria, and submission requirements are not explicitly documented within the provided text. The absence of evaluation criteria further reduces clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, value, and duration. However, the absence of detailed requirements for exclusion, eligibility, technical capability, financial standing, and submission procedures, along with a lack of document content, significantly impacts completeness.

No specific requirements listed for exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, or submission
Fairness85/100

The tender is open and does not appear to be tailored to specific companies. The estimated value is disclosed. The procedure is an open one, suggesting broad access, but the lack of detailed criteria could lead to subjective evaluations.

Practicality65/100

While an estimated contract start date and duration are provided, the absence of information regarding e-submission, direct document URLs, and specific financing details limits practicality. The deadline may also be tight for preparation.

No e-submission mentioned
Deadline may be too short for preparation and submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability40/100

The tender does not mention any specific green procurement, social aspects, innovation focus, or EU funding, indicating a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear general scope of work
Open procedure
Value disclosed
CPV code provided
Basic timeline information present

Concerns

Lack of detailed requirements (technical, financial, eligibility)
Missing evaluation criteria
No specific sustainability considerations
Absence of document content
Potential for tight submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Elaborate on specific technical capabilities, eligibility, financial, and submission requirements.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria (e.g., green procurement, social value).

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline