Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Groundworks and Fencing

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Restricted Procedure
Reference
022727-2026
Value
£3,000,000
Location
Essex, United Kingdom
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Budget
£3,000,000
Duration
60 months
Location
Essex
Type
Restricted Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The scoping document sets out the approach and requirements for the procurement and delivery of groundworks to properties and communal areas owned by Epping Forest district Council, with the objective of ensuring: • Undertaking works including excavation, clearance and preparation of sites. • Being fully compliant with all health and safety regulations. • Cost-effective, sustainable procurement that delivers value for money. Scope of Services Groundworks, including fencing repairs and new installations • Improvement of communal areas. • Designing out issues that may contribute to anti-social behaviour. • Ensuring areas are safe and fully operational for customers. • Using expertise to influence design specification of works. • Spoil removed from site, to be done so sustainably. Objectives • Deliver a consistent, quality service to customers. • Agree all appointments at convenient times with customers. • Communal works to be undertaken efficiently to agreed times, to reduce inconvenience to communities. • Follow variation guidance to ensure cost certainty. Quality Standards • Compliance with Building Regulations. • Health and Safety at Work Act 1974. • NHF Schedule of Rates 7.1 - Groundworks & Fencing. • Accreditation requirements: CHAS, Constructionline, timber suppliers CoC. • Ongoing performance monitoring and KPI reporting. Sustainability & Social Value • Use of sustainable materials and waste reduction strategies. • Commitment to carbon reduction in line with QPS and EFDC targets. • Promotion of local employment and apprenticeships. Risks and Mitigations Supply chain disruption - Access to multiple suppliers, forward ordering and local sourcing. Labour - Where possible recruit locally and limit subcontracting work. Tenant satisfaction - Clear communication with customers across the duration of the work including post-completion surveys. Governance & Performance Monitoring Dedicated contract management team with escalation routes. QPS to provide work orders in line with agreed programme quarterly. KPIs to include • Completions against Target Date • Planned Works in Progress updates. • Monthly performance reviews and quarterly strategic reporting. Conclusion This scoping document provides the framework for QPS's procurement and delivery of groundworks and fencing. The approach prioritises quality, cost-effectiveness, sustainability, ensuring alignment with both QPS's requirements and the long-term objectives of Epping Forest District Council. Please refer to the tender documents which will be emailed to you for completion. Length of contract will be for 5 years.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

65 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (29)
Technical (27)
Financial (3)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders will be emailed tender documents for completion.
--The contract length will be for 5 years.
--Bidders must be able to provide work orders in line with the agreed programme quarterly.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS29
--Must be able to undertake works including excavation, clearance and preparation of sites.
--Must be fully compliant with all health and safety regulations.
--Must demonstrate cost-effective, sustainable procurement that delivers value for money.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS27
--Ability to undertake excavation, clearance and preparation of sites.
--Ability to undertake groundworks, including fencing repairs and new installations.
--Ability to improve communal areas.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS3
--The total value of the contract is 3,000,000 EUR.
--The contract duration is 60 months (5 years).
--No specific financial stability or turnover requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender offers a good level of detail regarding scope and requirements, with a clear estimated value and duration. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and a defined e-submission process, impacting its overall practicality and transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general regulatory requirements, including a specified CPV code and a clear procedure type. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight given the scope. No disputes are indicated. The procedure is 'Competitive flexible procedure', which is a recognized type.

Clarity80/100

The description of services, objectives, quality standards, and sustainability aspects is comprehensive and well-articulated. Requirements are documented within the description and AI-extracted sections. The criteria for success are implicitly defined through KPIs and quality standards.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. However, the tender documents themselves are not available for review (indicated by 'Documents with content/summaries: 0'), which is a significant gap. The AI-extracted requirements are extensive, but their direct link to the actual tender documents is unconfirmed.

Tender documents content not available for review.
Fairness85/100

The estimated value is disclosed, and the procedure is competitive. The requirements are detailed and objective, focusing on capabilities and standards rather than specific company names. Full document access is implied but not confirmed due to the lack of available document content. The use of a 'Competitive flexible procedure' suggests a degree of fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a submission deadline and contract duration. However, it explicitly states 'Please refer to the tender documents which will be emailed to you for completion,' indicating a lack of a standardized e-submission portal, which reduces practicality. Financing information is not detailed. The contract start date is provided.

No e-submission portal indicated; documents to be emailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date are populated. The CPV code and NUTS code are provided. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender explicitly mentions sustainability, including 'sustainable procurement,' 'sustainable materials and waste reduction strategies,' and 'commitment to carbon reduction.' It also includes social value aspects like 'promotion of local employment and apprenticeships.' However, it is not explicitly stated as 'Green Procurement' or EU funded, and innovation is not a primary focus.

Not explicitly flagged as 'Green Procurement'.

Strengths

Detailed scope of services and objectives.
Clear estimated value and contract duration.
Inclusion of sustainability and social value aspects.
Well-defined quality standards and accreditation requirements.

Concerns

Lack of available tender document content for review.
Absence of specified evaluation criteria.
Non-standard submission process (emailing documents).

Recommendations

1. Provide access to full tender documents with clear content summaries.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to enhance transparency.
3. Implement a standardized e-submission process for improved efficiency and practicality.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline