Skip to main content
Tenders

UCG PUBLIC RELATIONS AGENCY SERVICES

Closed

Submission Deadline Has Passed

This tender's submission deadline has passed and is no longer accepting applications. The information below is kept for reference purposes.

Browse Active Tenders
Deadline
Expired
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
021799-2026
Value
£72,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 23, 2026

Budget
£72,000
Duration
12 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

UNITED COLLEGES GROUP PUBLIC RELATIONS AGENCY SERVICES, INITIALLY 1 YEAR

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for public relations services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting clarity and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements, including a clear procedure (open competition below threshold) and a specified CPV code. No disputes are reported. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The primary legal concern is the absence of specified evaluation criteria, which is a significant omission.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The title, description, and basic financial information are clear. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce overall clarity regarding the precise expectations and how submissions will be assessed.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration/start date. However, the critical omission of accessible tender documents and the lack of specified evaluation criteria mean essential components for a complete submission are missing.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition, suggesting a fair process. The value is disclosed, and the procedure is standard. There are no immediate indications of requirements tailored to specific companies. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria, which could indirectly affect fairness.

Practicality65/100

The contract start date and duration are specified. Financing information is not explicitly detailed, and the lack of e-submission is a drawback. The primary practical issue is the inability to access tender documents, making it difficult to prepare a submission.

No e-submission
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for the contract start and submission deadline are consistent with the active status.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and CPV code specified
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
Open competition procedure

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No accessible tender document content
Potential for a short submission deadline
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Make all tender documents accessible with full content.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline