Skip to main content
Tenders

Occupational Health, Medical and Health Surveillance Services

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
027001-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
60 months
Location
North East England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Occupational Health, Medical and Health Surveillance Services for Salix Homes

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Occupational Health, Medical and Health Surveillance Services is in the planning stage, with a clear description and CPV code. However, it lacks disclosed financial value and detailed evaluation criteria, impacting completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning stage, which means formal legal compliance checks are premature. The CPV code is provided, and the status indicates it's not yet active, suggesting no immediate disputes or regulatory issues. Deadlines are not yet critical as it's planning.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, specifying the service required. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria means bidders cannot fully understand how their submissions will be assessed, reducing overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While basic details like duration and start date are present, the lack of financial transparency and detailed evaluation criteria hinders completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is divided into parts, which can promote fairness. However, the undisclosed estimated value and the lack of specified evaluation criteria prevent a full assessment of fairness. The absence of information on e-submission also raises concerns.

Value Classified: Yes (implies not disclosed)
No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is in the planning stage, and the lack of information regarding e-submission and financing details makes it difficult to assess practical aspects. The contract start date is provided, but the absence of a clear submission portal or process is a drawback.

No e-submission
Financing info not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, CPV, and contract duration/start date are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency for the available information.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which are increasingly important in public procurement. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
CPV code provided
Contract duration and start date specified
Divided into parts

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
No e-submission mentioned
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the contract.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Specify the e-submission process and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline