Skip to main content
Tenders

Health insurance for employees of Aizkraukle Municipality and its institutions

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
165876
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Zemgale, Latvia
Published
March 11, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 11, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Tender Opening

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Zemgale
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€139,128
Avg. Bids
2.6
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
1,731 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Health insurance for employees of Aizkraukle Municipality and its institutions

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--[Requirements for submitting the bid as detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija" and "Nolikums"]
--EVALUATION CRITERIA
--[Evaluation criteria for health insurance services as detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija"]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Requirements related to exclusion grounds as detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija"]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Requirements related to eligibility as detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija"]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Requirements related to technical capability for health insurance services as detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija"]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Requirements related to financial standing as detailed in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija"]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
165876_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260311050844.pdf -- 102.6 KB

This document contains the procurement requirements, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for health insurance services for employees of the Aizkraukles municipality.

Līguma projektsDOC
Liguma_projekts.docx -- 42.0 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the health insurance of employees of the Aizkraukle municipality and its institutions, outlining terms, conditions, and payment procedures.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_AND_2026_21_.docx -- 93.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the health insurance of employees of the Aizkraukle municipality and its institutions.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for health insurance services for employees of the Aizkraukles municipality and its institutions, with a submission deadline of April 13, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for employee health insurance is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable deadline. However, the lack of disclosed value and specific evaluation criteria, along with potential document access restrictions, slightly impacts its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal requirements with a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline is reasonable. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the main notice could be a minor compliance concern if not fully detailed in the attached documents.

Clarity80/100

The description of the service is clear. Key requirements are referenced in attached documents, which is standard practice. The main tender notice provides a good overview, but the specific evaluation criteria are not immediately visible, requiring users to access additional documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadlines. The estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. Contract duration is also not explicitly stated in the main notice, though it can likely be inferred from the contract draft.

Estimated value not disclosed
Contract duration not explicitly stated in main notice
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting broad participation. The use of e-procurement is positive. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag raises a concern about full document accessibility for all potential bidders. The lack of disclosed value also hinders a fair assessment of the opportunity.

Restricted document access flag
Estimated value not disclosed
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential manual submission process or a lack of clarity on the e-submission platform. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent.

No e-submission indicated
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided tender details. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement criteria
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear service description and objective
Open procedure for broad participation
Use of e-procurement
Reasonable submission deadline
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Potential restricted document access
Evaluation criteria not explicitly stated in main notice
Lack of sustainability considerations
Unclear e-submission process

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency and fairness.
2. Clarify the document access procedure and ensure all relevant documents are readily available to all potential bidders.
3. Incorporate specific sustainability criteria (e.g., green procurement, social aspects) into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline