Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

CS6089 Specialist Youth Services - SEND Provision

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
028177-2026
Value
£320,000
Location
London, United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

August 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£320,000
Duration
24 months
Location
London
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tower Hamlets Council is committed to strengthening specialist SEND provision across the borough, ensuring that children and young people with additional needs have access to safe, inclusive, and high-quality environments. The commissioned Specialist SEND Ward-Based Activity provision will focus on delivering centre-based support in wards where in-house SEND youth provision is not currently available.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

18 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (8)
Technical (7)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements listed. Bidders will need to provide details on their proposed venue, service delivery model, and how they will meet the technical and eligibility requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds listed, but typically include bankruptcy, fraud, corruption, and conflicts of interest.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS8
--Must be able to deliver services from a designated building within each ward or service lot.
--Providers may use their own premises or buildings leased for this purpose.
--The proposed venue's suitability, accessibility, and quality will be evaluated.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS7
--Ability to deliver specialist SEND Ward-Based Activity provision.
--Experience in providing centre-based support for young people with SEND.
--Capacity to manage and operate a designated building for service delivery.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements listed, but bidders will likely need to demonstrate financial stability and capacity to deliver the service within the allocated budget.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is well-structured with a clear description of services and objectives. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement principles. The CPV code is appropriate, and there are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The procedure type is not explicitly stated, which is a minor omission.

Procedure type not specified
Clarity80/100

The description of the service and the council's commitment to SEND provision is clear and detailed. The AI-extracted requirements are well-defined, outlining the expected capabilities and service delivery model. The objectives are clearly articulated.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, crucial details such as specific evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements are missing, which hinders a complete understanding of the bidding process.

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Missing detailed submission requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness by disclosing the estimated value and providing access to the description. The criteria for venue suitability are objective. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies. The use of e-procurement is implied but not explicitly confirmed.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of explicit mention of e-submission and the absence of document content summaries reduce practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

No explicit mention of e-submission
No document content available for review
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline appears consistent. The status 'planning' is also noted.

Sustainability50/100

The tender mentions 'inclusive practice' and 'healthy lifestyles', which touch upon social aspects. However, there is no explicit focus on green procurement, innovation, or confirmation of EU funding, limiting the sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit innovation focus

Strengths

Clear and detailed service description
Well-defined objectives for SEND provision
Disclosure of estimated value and key dates
Appropriate CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing specific evaluation criteria
Lack of detailed submission requirements
Absence of document content for review
Potential for a short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Provide specific evaluation criteria to guide bidders.
2. Detail the submission requirements and process, including e-submission instructions.
3. Include summaries or full content of tender documents for easier access.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline