Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Single-use vascular surgery products

Open
Deadline
25 days left
April 29, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
168987
Value
€400,000
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 26, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Financial offersPrice
Delivery timesTimeline
Product validityQuality
Technical detailsTechnical
ConformityTechnical
Proposals according to specificationsTechnical
Technical capability requirementsTechnical
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 22, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 29, 2026

Tender Opening

April 29, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€400,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Riga
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€36,535
Avg. Bids
2.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
23,680 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Single-use vascular surgery products

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender focuses on the supply of essential disposable vascular surgery products. A winning strategy will hinge on demonstrating unwavering compliance with technical specifications, competitive pricing, and robust supply chain reliability. Given the absence of specified evaluation criteria, a strong emphasis on meeting all mandatory requirements and exceeding expectations in areas like product quality and delivery assurance will be crucial.

Key Winning Messages

Reliable supply of high-quality, compliant vascular surgery disposables.

Competitive and sustainable pricing for essential medical supplies.

Unwavering commitment to hospital operational continuity through timely delivery and product integrity.

Key Opportunities
Potential for strong pricing advantage due to lack of specified evaluation criteria, allowing focus on cost-competitiveness.
Opportunity to differentiate through superior product quality and extended shelf-life beyond minimum requirements.
Leveraging existing strong relationships with Latvian healthcare institutions, particularly major hospitals like Paula Stradiņa.
Demonstrating robust supply chain management to guarantee consistent availability and meet delivery timelines.
Key Challenges
Lack of specified evaluation criteria makes it difficult to optimize bid strategy for scoring.

Focus on exceeding all stated mandatory requirements and providing clear, unambiguous evidence of compliance. Assume a strong emphasis on price and technical compliance will be paramount.

Potential for intense price competition if other bidders adopt a low-cost strategy.

Conduct thorough market analysis to understand competitor pricing. Balance competitive pricing with demonstrating value through quality, reliability, and service.

Ensuring strict adherence to all technical specifications and conformity requirements for a diverse range of products.

Implement rigorous internal quality control processes and cross-reference all product specifications against the 'Tehniskā specifikācija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'.

Ideal Bidder Profile
An established medical device supplier with a proven track record in providing high-quality, single-use surgical consumables, particularly those used in vascular surgery. The ideal bidder possesses a strong understanding of hospital procurement processes, a robust quality management system, efficient logistics, and the capacity to offer competitive pricing while ensuring consistent product availability and validity.
Key Requirements
Adherence to delivery times
Ensuring product validity
Meeting technical specifications for single-use vascular surgery products
Submission of proposals according to specifications outlined in 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'
Ensuring conformity of products
Meeting mandatory exclusion grounds
Meeting eligibility requirements
Key Discriminators
Exceptional product quality and extended shelf-life.
Demonstrated supply chain resilience and proven ability to meet tight delivery schedules.
Competitive pricing coupled with a clear value proposition.
Proactive customer support and responsiveness.
Social Value Opportunities
While 'Social Aspects: No' is stated, consider subtly highlighting any existing corporate social responsibility initiatives or local employment practices that align with broader public sector expectations, if applicable and not overly burdensome to disclose.
Bid Focus Areas
Technical Compliance

Meticulously map all products to the 'Tehniskā specifikācija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'. Provide detailed technical documentation and certifications for each item. Ensure all products meet or exceed stated specifications.

Price

Conduct thorough cost analysis to offer competitive pricing. Consider volume discounts or tiered pricing structures if appropriate. Ensure pricing is clear, transparent, and covers all costs.

Delivery and Validity

Clearly state delivery lead times and confirm product expiry dates. Provide evidence of robust logistics and inventory management systems that guarantee timely delivery and product freshness.

Recommendations6
Thorough Technical Specification Review
CriticalHigh effort

Conduct an exhaustive review of 'Tehniskā specifikācija' and 'Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija'. Map every product offered against each requirement, highlighting compliance and any potential deviations (though deviations should be avoided).

Ensures bid meets all mandatory technical requirements, preventing disqualification.
Competitive Pricing Strategy
CriticalMed effort

Develop a pricing model that is highly competitive for the estimated value of 400,000.0 EUR. Benchmark against market rates and consider cost efficiencies. Since evaluation criteria are not specified, assume price will be a significant factor.

Increases chances of winning if price is a primary driver.
Demonstrate Supply Chain Robustness
HighMed effort

Provide evidence of a resilient supply chain, including inventory management systems, supplier relationships, and contingency plans to ensure consistent availability and adherence to delivery times.

Builds confidence in the bidder's ability to meet ongoing demand.
Verify Product Validity and Shelf-Life
HighLow effort

Ensure all proposed products have a substantial shelf-life, exceeding the minimum requirements. Clearly state the typical expiry dates for the products offered.

Addresses a critical tender requirement and enhances perceived product quality.
Mandatory Exclusion Grounds Check
CriticalLow effort

Conduct a thorough internal check to ensure the bidding entity and its key personnel are not subject to any mandatory exclusion grounds as per EU procurement directives and Latvian law.

Prevents immediate disqualification.
Clarity on Conformity
MediumLow effort

Clearly articulate how product conformity will be assured and documented throughout the contract duration. Reference relevant certifications (e.g., CE marking).

Reinforces quality assurance and compliance.
Competitive Positioning
Position as a reliable, quality-focused supplier with a proven track record in the Latvian healthcare market. Emphasize consistency in product supply and adherence to stringent quality standards. Highlight competitive pricing as a key benefit without compromising on quality or reliability.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must adhere to delivery times.
--Bidders must ensure product validity.
--Bidders must submit technical details.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet selection requirements.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet technical specifications for single-use vascular surgery products.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must provide financial offers.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168987_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260326052103.pdf -- 101.4 KB

This document outlines the exclusion conditions and selection requirements for bidders participating in a tender for disposable vascular surgery supplies, including technical and financial proposal specifications.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_2026_13.doc -- 480.0 KB

This document is the regulations for an open tender for the supply of disposable vascular surgery products by VSIA "Paula Stradiņa klīniskā universitātes slimnīca".

Tehniskā specifikācijaXLS
TS_FIN_2.xlsx -- 22.5 KB

This document contains the technical specifications for single-use vascular surgery products, outlining general requirements for financial offers, delivery times, product validity, technical details, and conformity.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender procedure for the supply of disposable vascular surgery products by Paula Stradiņa Clinical University Hospital, with a submission deadline of April 29, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for disposable vascular surgery products is generally well-structured with clear requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the absence of specified evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and an open procedure. Deadlines are reasonable, and no disputes are noted. The procedure is clearly defined as open e-procurement.

Clarity80/100

The description of the supplies is clear, and the technical specifications are detailed in attached documents. Requirements for bidders are outlined, although the absence of explicit evaluation criteria could be improved.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, contract duration, and deadlines. Four tender documents are provided, covering regulations, technical specifications, and requirements. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria impacts completeness.

Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, and the estimated value is disclosed. Criteria are objective in nature (technical capability, financial offers). However, the 'Restricted document access' flag suggests potential fairness issues if not all bidders can access all necessary information equally.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. The contract duration and estimated value are specified. However, the 'No e-submission' flag indicates a potential lack of a fully integrated e-submission process, which could hinder practicality.

No e-submission
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. Dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The tender status is active.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are areas for potential improvement in line with modern procurement practices.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear open e-procurement procedure
Detailed technical specifications provided
Reasonable submission deadline and contract duration
Estimated value disclosed

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential lack of full e-submission integration

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to ensure full integration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline