Skip to main content
Tenders

Pest Control Services 2026

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020710-2026
Value
£650,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 09, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

May 31, 2026

Budget
£650,000
Duration
48 months
Location
North West England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

MSV Housing Group is establishing a framework for the provision of Pest Control Services. MSV Housing Group detailed requirements are as set out in the Specification included within the tender documents.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Pest Control Services is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall completeness and clarity.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure (open procedure), a proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadlines appear reasonable within the context of an open procedure. The absence of a reveal date is a minor oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description is concise, and the existence of a 'Specification' document is noted. However, the lack of available content for the tender documents and the absence of specified evaluation criteria make it difficult to fully assess the clarity of requirements.

No evaluation criteria specified
No document content available
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of accessible content for the tender documents and the missing evaluation criteria significantly reduce its completeness.

No document content available
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, which generally promotes fairness. The value is disclosed, and the deadlines appear reasonable. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could be a concern for bidders. There is no indication of requirements tailored to specific companies.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document URLs limit its practicality for potential bidders. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission
Document URL not provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a limited focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Estimated value and contract duration disclosed
Open procedure for broad participation
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
No content available for tender documents
Lack of e-submission details
Limited sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Provide full content or summaries for all tender documents.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria.
3. Specify the e-submission process and provide relevant links.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline