Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of technical support and athlete accommodation buildings for the Skalite ski jumping complex

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00167730/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Śląskie, Poland
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 23, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Śląskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of technical support and athlete accommodation buildings for the Skalite ski jumping complex

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de890b-e7c6-779f-056e-e50001aaa04a.pdf

This document contains a public procurement notice for the renovation of technical support and athlete accommodation buildings at the Skalite ski jumping complex.

DECYZJA O POZWOLENIU NA BUDOWĘ_JUNIOR 1 I 2.pdfPDF
DECYZJA O POZWOLENIU NA BUDOWĘ_JUNIOR 1 I 2.p... -- 328.1 KB

No content extracted

DECYZJA O POZWOLENIU NA BUDOWĘ_JUNIOR 3.pdfPDF
DECYZJA O POZWOLENIU NA BUDOWĘ_JUNIOR 3.pdf -- 308.4 KB

No content extracted

Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia.pdfPDF
Specyfikacja Warunków Zamówienia.pdf

This document contains the Specification of the Order Conditions for the reconstruction of technical support and athlete accommodation buildings for the Skalite ski jumping complex.

Załącznik nr 12 – Projekt zagospodarowania terenu wraz z projektem architektonic...PDF
Załącznik nr 12 – Projekt zagospodarowania te...

No content extracted

Załącznik nr 5 – Projektowane postanowienia umowy.pdfPDF
Załącznik nr 5 – Projektowane postanowienia u...

This document contains the draft contract for the reconstruction of technical support and athlete accommodation buildings for the Skalite ski jumping complex.

Załącznik nr 9 – Harmonogram rzeczowo-finansowy.xlsXLS
Załącznik nr 9 – Harmonogram rzeczowo-finanso...

This document contains a detailed financial and scope schedule for Stage I of the reconstruction of technical support and athlete accommodation buildings for the Skalite ski jumping complex.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a good set of attachments, but lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and financial aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general procurement practices, with a clear CPV code and location. The absence of specific mentioned disputes or regulatory issues contributes positively. The submission deadline, while active, could potentially be tight given the date.

Clarity80/100

The title and description are clear, and the presence of essential documents like the Specification of the Order Conditions and draft contract enhances clarity. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves a significant gap.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, and a submission deadline. A good number of documents are attached, providing project details. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and specific details regarding exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements are absent.

Estimated value not disclosed
Mandatory exclusion grounds not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is characterized by 'E-Procurement', promoting transparency. The full access to documents and the disclosure of the contract draft are positive. As no specific company requirements are noted, the fairness score is high. The lack of disclosed value and specific eligibility criteria are minor drawbacks in this regard.

Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as 'E-Procurement', which is a positive for submission practicality. However, there is no explicit mention of e-submission functionality within the provided details, nor is the contract start date or duration clearly specified. The financing information is also not detailed.

No e-submission functionality explicitly mentioned
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (tender creation vs. deadline) are logically ordered, suggesting good data integrity.

Sustainability50/100

There is no mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender details, which is a missed opportunity to promote these important factors.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear title and description
Comprehensive set of relevant documents attached
Designated as E-Procurement
CPV code and location specified

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Absence of specific eligibility and technical requirements
Unclear contract duration and start date

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value.
2. Clearly define the evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Specify the contract start date and duration.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline