Supply and Delivery of Janitorial Supplies including Laundry Dosing systems and detergent

This tender for janitorial supplies is generally well-structured with clear objectives and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission requirements, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

The tender follows an open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and the estimated value is disclosed. There is no indication of disputes. The procedure appears compliant with general procurement rules, though the absence of a reveal date is a minor oversight.

The description of the required janitorial supplies and services is clear. The need for collaboration with departments and aftercare is well-articulated. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, contract duration, and start date. The CPV code is provided. However, the lack of detailed submission requirements and the absence of content in the tender documents reduce its completeness.

The tender is open, allowing for sole suppliers or consortia, which promotes competition. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for consortium bids (lead organization) are objective. The procedure is open, and e-procurement is implied by the structure, though not explicitly stated as mandatory for submission.

The contract start date and duration are clear. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. While an e-submission is likely, it's not explicitly stated as the sole method. The lack of detailed submission requirements and document content hinders practical preparation for bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided for submission, contract start, and duration are consistent.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding requirements, which are common in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.