Skip to main content
Tenders

5460HP - Hengoed Primary School - SRB Provision

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 02, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
026753-2026
Value
£60,000
Location
West Wales and The Valleys, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 26, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 02, 2026

Contract Start Date

April 12, 2026

Budget
£60,000
Duration
2 months
Location
West Wales and The Valleys
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Tender for SRB Provisions to Hengoed Primary School. The scope includes the provision of SRB facilities in line with specific drawings. Key dates: Tender Return Date: 02 April 2026, Construction Start: 13 April 2026 (or sooner), Duration: 5 weeks.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Tender Return Date: 02 April 2026, 12:00:00+01:00.
--Bidders must submit a tender for the SRB Provisions to Hengoed Primary School.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be able to undertake building construction work (CPV: 45210000).
--Bidders must be able to provide SRB facilities in line with drawing no, A01, A02, A03.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--The scope of the project is fully described in the drawings and schedules of works.
--Bidders must be able to complete the construction within a 5-week duration.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The value of the tender is 60,000.0 EUR.
--The duration of the project is 2 months (note: this conflicts with the 5-week construction duration mentioned elsewhere).

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for SRB Provisions at Hengoed Primary School is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks detailed evaluation criteria and accessible document content, impacting its overall quality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a clear CPV code and a stated procedure. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline appears tight. No disputes are noted. The procedure is 'Below threshold - open competition', which is compliant for its value.

Clarity80/100

The description provides a summary of the scope and references specific drawings (A01, A02, A03). However, the full scope is only mentioned as being in 'drawings and schedules of works' which are not accessible or detailed within the provided text. The core requirements are understandable, but the lack of accessible detailed documentation limits clarity.

Full scope relies on external, inaccessible documents.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, the crucial tender documents are not provided with content, and the evaluation criteria are missing, which are significant omissions for a complete tender package.

Tender documents lack content.
Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Fairness85/100

The tender is open competition, and the value is disclosed, promoting fairness. The criteria are objective in terms of technical capability (building construction, SRB facilities). There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies. The lack of accessible full documentation and evaluation criteria slightly reduces perceived fairness.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the unavailability of document URLs significantly hinder practical access and submission for potential bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

No information on e-submission process.
No URLs for tender documents.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. A minor inconsistency exists between the 'Contract Duration' (2 months) and the 'Duration' mentioned in the description (5 weeks), though the latter seems more specific to construction.

Minor inconsistency between contract duration (2 months) and construction duration (5 weeks).
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are standard components of modern sustainable procurement practices. This area is entirely absent.

No mention of green procurement.
No mention of social aspects.

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization.
Estimated value and CPV code provided.
Open competition procedure for below-threshold value.
Basic scope description is present.

Concerns

Missing crucial tender documents and evaluation criteria.
Lack of e-submission details and document accessibility.
Short submission deadline.
Absence of sustainability considerations.

Recommendations

1. Provide full tender documents with detailed scope and evaluation criteria.
2. Specify the e-submission process and provide direct links to documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability criteria into the tender.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline