Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

NHSE987 - Eye Testing in Special Education Settings in North West - CP

Open
Deadline
33 days left
April 30, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
028348-2026
Value
£5,367,000
Location
North West England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 27, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 23, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 30, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£5,367,000
Duration
36 months
Location
North West England
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

North of England Commissioning Support (NECS) is undertaking a competition to provide Eye Testing Services in Special Education Settings (SES) in the North West. Contract Start Date: 01 September 2026, Contract End Date: 31 August 2029. The contract term is for a period of 3 years.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[No specific requirements listed in the provided text]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for eye testing services in special education settings is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to open procedure and provides a CPV code. Deadlines are specified, and the value is disclosed. No disputes are noted. The primary concern is the potential shortness of the submission deadline relative to the complexity of the tender, which could be a minor legal compliance issue if it hinders fair competition.

Submission deadline may be too short.
Clarity80/100

The description of the service and the contracting authorities is clear. The contract duration and start/end dates are well-defined. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria makes it unclear how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the lack of available document content and the absence of specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) significantly reduce completeness.

No document content available.
Missing specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission).
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with a disclosed value and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. The criteria for division into parts are not specified, but the overall process appears objective. The lack of specific requirements could be seen as a positive for broader participation, but the absence of evaluation criteria is a concern.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract start date. However, the lack of explicit information on e-submission mechanisms and the absence of document content make practical engagement challenging for potential bidders.

No e-submission mechanism specified.
No document content available.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The contract start and end dates align with the stated duration.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on these sustainability dimensions.

Not green procurement.
No social criteria.

Strengths

Clear basic information and title.
Disclosed estimated value and contract duration.
Open procedure and e-procurement indicated.
Logical date consistency.

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria.
No document content available for review.
Absence of explicit sustainability considerations.
Potential shortness of submission deadline.

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed evaluation criteria.
2. Make tender documents fully accessible with content.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if deemed too short.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline