Skip to main content
Tenders

Delivery of donor snack kits

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 14, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
169019
Value
€138,479
Location
Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 07, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 14, 2026

Tender Opening

April 14, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€138,479
Duration
24 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€44,844
Avg. Bids
2.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
100%
8,535 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of donor snack kits

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender document outlines submission requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The tender document outlines exclusion conditions.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender document outlines selection criteria.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender document outlines technical proposal requirements.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--The tender document outlines financial proposal requirements.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

3 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169019_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324141001.pdf -- 98.1 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning the supply of donor snack kits, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums_VADC_2026_02.docx -- 99.6 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the supply of donor snack kits by the State Blood Donor Centre.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender VADC 2026/02, which is an open competition for the supply of donor snack kits, with a submission deadline of April 14, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for donor snack kits is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable timeline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the explicit specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements, including a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the available information.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key requirements such as exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, and financial capabilities are mentioned as being outlined in the documents. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria in the summary reduces overall clarity.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria in summary
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and deadlines. Three tender documents are provided, covering technical specifications and regulations. However, the 'Main tender page' document is not marked as required, and the lack of explicit evaluation criteria in the summary impacts completeness.

Main tender page not marked as required
Evaluation criteria not explicitly detailed in summary
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with disclosed value and uses e-procurement, promoting fairness. However, the 'Restricted document access' flag indicates a potential barrier to full document access for all interested parties, which is a significant concern for fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and has a specified contract start date implied by the duration. Financing information is not explicitly detailed. While e-procurement is mentioned, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks suggests a potential issue with the submission process itself, impacting practicality.

No e-submission indicated in checks
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear basic information and title
Reasonable deadlines and contract duration
Open procedure with disclosed value
CPV code provided

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential issues with e-submission process
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify document access policies and ensure full availability.
2. Explicitly state evaluation criteria within the tender summary or accessible documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline