Skip to main content
Tenders

Assessment of nuclear energy development opportunities in the Republic of Latvia

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
164152
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Latvia
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
15 months
Location
Latvia
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€45,411
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
98%
1,077 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Assessment of nuclear energy development opportunities in the Republic of Latvia

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (3)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-01T10:00:00.
--Bids must adhere to the regulations outlined in the "Nolikums" document.
--Bids must be submitted in English, Estonian, Latvian, Polish, Lithuanian, or French.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS3
--Bidders must not have been convicted of criminal offenses.
--Bidders must not have outstanding tax and social security payments.
--Bidders must not be subject to insolvency proceedings or professional misconduct.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not specified.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
164152_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260224051947.pdf -- 107.8 KB

This document outlines the exclusion criteria and selection requirements for bidders, detailing reasons related to criminal convictions, tax and social security payments, and insolvency or professional misconduct.

ENG translate NolikumsDOC
ENG_Nolikums_KEM_2026_1-gala.docx -- 116.5 KB

This document outlines the rules of procedure for an open tender to assess the possibilities for developing nuclear energy in Latvia, including submission requirements and deadlines.

NolikumsDOC
Nolikums KEM 2026_1-gala.docx -- 124.7 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for an assessment of nuclear energy development opportunities in the Republic of Latvia.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender KEM 2026/1, which is an open competition for research and development consulting services regarding the possibilities of nuclear energy development in Latvia.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for an assessment of nuclear energy development opportunities in Latvia is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable timeline. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of specified technical and financial evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, a specified CPV code, and being an active procurement. The deadlines appear reasonable for the scope. There is no indication of disputes. The presence of mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements suggests regulatory adherence.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Key documents like the 'Nolikums' and technical requirements are available, providing a good basis for understanding the scope. However, the absence of specified technical and financial evaluation criteria detracts from overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, title, reference, and duration. Deadlines are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which is a significant omission for completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open competition with e-procurement, promoting fairness. Mandatory exclusion grounds and eligibility requirements are standard. The availability of documents, including translations, is positive. However, the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria could be perceived as a fairness issue, as bidders may not fully understand how their proposals will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement and provides document URLs. The contract duration is specified. However, the 'Issues' section flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic and needs clarification. Financing information is not explicitly detailed.

No e-submission (flagged in issues, contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes. Dates appear logical within the context of the tender timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
Open competition procedure
E-Procurement characteristic
Availability of key documents and translations
Reasonable deadlines

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
No technical or financial evaluation criteria specified
Potential contradiction regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify the technical and financial evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to ensure consistency with the e-procurement characteristic.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline