Skip to main content
Tenders

Poland – Network servers – Delivery of server infrastructure

Open
Deadline
17 days left
April 13, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/S 50-172343
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 12, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 06, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 13, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
48 months
Location
Poland
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€621,516
Avg. Bids
0.7
Competition
Low
SME Winners
93%
5,860 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Poland – Network servers – Delivery of server infrastructure

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de7fd5-1175-43ab-056e-e50001ac73dd.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the supply of server infrastructure, specifically 6 servers with a minimum of 4-year technical support, to BANKOWY FUNDUSZ GWARANCYJNY in Warsaw, Poland.

Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdfPDF
Ogłoszenie o zamówieniu.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the supply of 6 network servers and a minimum of 4-year technical support in Warsaw, Poland, with evaluation criteria based on price (60%) and warranty/support (40%).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for network servers in Poland presents a generally well-structured procurement process with accessible documentation. However, the undisclosed estimated value and lack of explicit evaluation criteria detract from full transparency.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to most regulatory requirements with a clear CPV code, though the procedure type is not explicitly stated. Reasonable deadlines and proper documentation are present. No disputes are indicated, contributing to a good score.

Clarity80/100

The description of the required server infrastructure and technical support is clear. Mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical, financial, and submission requirements are outlined, indicating well-documented specifications. The evaluation criteria, however, are missing from the provided summary, which is a point of concern.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most essential information like deadlines, contract duration, and organization are provided. A comprehensive set of 11 tender documents is available. The estimated value is notably absent, impacting the completeness score.

Value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through accessible documents and the 'E-Procurement' characteristic. The criteria for evaluation are partially disclosed (price, warranty/support), suggesting an objective approach. The lack of a disclosed estimated value and potential for a tight deadline (depending on interpretation) are minor concerns.

Practicality65/100

The tender is designated as 'E-Procurement', indicating a modern submission method. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent. The contract duration is clearly stated.

No e-submission
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are consistently populated. The absence of disputes and suspension information further enhances data consistency. The CPV code is listed, contributing to logical data integrity.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding in the provided tender details, which leads to a moderate score in this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear description of required infrastructure
Comprehensive set of tender documents available
E-Procurement characteristic specified
Good data consistency

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Potential for tight submission deadline (depending on interpretation)

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the tender.
2. Clearly state all evaluation criteria in the tender notice.
3. Ensure the submission deadline provides adequate time for preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline