Skip to main content
Tenders

Selective renovation works in the building of Rīga Imanta Secondary School at Kurzemes prospekts 158, Rīga

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
167889
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 19, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Procurement Subject RequirementsOther
Work PlanTimeline
Cost EstimatePrice
Technical SpecificationTechnical
Design TaskTechnical
Financial StatementOther
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Selective renovation works in the building of Rīga Imanta Secondary School at Kurzemes prospekts 158, Rīga

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (5)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline of 2026-04-07T10:00:00.
--Bids must be submitted in the format specified in the tender documents.
--Bids must include all required documentation as outlined in "Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versija".
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders shall not be subject to any of the exclusion grounds specified in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be registered in the relevant commercial register.
--Bidders must have the necessary permits and licenses to perform renovation works.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Bidders must demonstrate experience in similar renovation works, as evidenced by past projects.
--Bidders must provide a detailed technical proposal outlining their approach to the renovation works, including methodologies, materials, and equipment.
--Bidders must adhere to the technical specifications provided in the "Tehniskā specifikācija (ar 1.1.pielikumu)" document.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must report their financial turnover in the construction sector over the past three years, as per the form provided in "Atklāta konkursa NOLIKUMS ar pielikumiem".
--Bidders must provide a cost estimate (Koptāme) for the selective renovation works, including itemized costs and total expenses with VAT, as detailed in "1.2. pielikums - darbu apjomi".

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

Atklāta konkursa NOLIKUMS ar pielikumiemDOC
10.pielikums_Finanšu izziņa__1.doc -- 51.0 KB

This document contains a form for reporting the financial turnover of a bidder in the construction sector over the past three years, as part of an open tender for renovation works.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
167889_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260319152343.pdf -- 100.7 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical proposal specifications, financial proposal requirements, and evaluation criteria for the renovation works at Rīga Imanta Secondary School.

1.2. pielikums - darbu apjomiXLS
Pielikums Nr.1.2_Apjomi_Kurzemes pr_158.xlsx -- 136.6 KB

This document contains a cost estimate (Koptāme) for selective renovation works at Rīgas Imantas vidusskolas building, including itemized costs and total expenses with VAT.

1.3. pielikums - darbu plānsPDF
Pielikums Nr.1.3_Darbu plāns_Kurzemes_pr_158.... -- 2.1 MB

This document contains a detailed specification and plan for various types of doors, including their dimensions, materials, hardware, and specific requirements for different areas.

1.4. pielikums - projektēšanas uzdevumsDOC
Pielikums Nr.1.4_RDA prasības_Kurzemes_prospe... -- 38.7 KB

This document outlines the technical specifications and requirements for a design task, including applicable regulations, standards, equipment, and deliverables for network infrastructure development.

Tehniskā specifikācija (ar 1.1.pielikumu)DOC
Pielikums_Nr.1._tehniskā_specifikācija_Kurzem... -- 45.1 KB

This document contains the technical specification for selective renovation works at Rīgas Imantas Vidusskola, outlining requirements for preparation, execution, materials, and site organization.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the main data for an open tender for renovation works at Rīgas Imantas vidusskolas, with a submission deadline of April 7, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation works at Rīgas Imantas vidusskola is generally well-structured with clear technical requirements and a reasonable timeline. However, the lack of disclosed financial value and specific evaluation criteria are notable concerns.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by specifying a clear procedure (open competition), providing a CPV code, and having a reasonable submission deadline. The absence of reported disputes further strengthens this category. However, the lack of disclosed financial value could be a minor compliance issue in some jurisdictions.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the requirements are documented through various attached specifications and appendices. The criteria for technical capability and financial reporting are specified, contributing to good clarity. The conditions for performance are also referenced.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the title, organization, description, and timeline details. Key documents like technical specifications and financial forms are attached. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, which impacts completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through an open procedure, e-procurement, and the disclosure of most requirements. The deadlines appear reasonable. However, the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag indicates a potential barrier to full document access for all potential bidders, which lowers the fairness score.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides URLs for documents. The contract duration is stated. However, the lack of explicit financing information and the absence of a clear contract start date (beyond the duration) reduce practicality.

No explicit financing information
Contract start date not explicitly stated
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadlines are populated. The tender status is active, and there are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical and consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded. This lack of focus on sustainability aspects results in a moderate score.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social criteria

Strengths

Clear technical specifications and requirements
Open tender procedure with e-procurement
Reasonable submission deadline and tender validity period
Detailed documentation provided for technical and financial aspects

Concerns

Estimated financial value not disclosed
Missing specific evaluation criteria
Potential restricted document access

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated financial value of the tender.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline