Skip to main content
Tenders

Replacement of 330kV overhead line poles

Open
Deadline
4 days left
March 31, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
160286
Value
€21,970,094
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
February 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 24, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 31, 2026

Tender Opening

March 31, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€21,970,094
Duration
Not specified
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Replacement of 330kV overhead line poles

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

9 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (2)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Submission requirements are outlined in Document: Nolikums ar pielikumiem.
--Basic tender data, including deadlines and contact information, is available in Document: Main tender page.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Exclusion conditions are outlined in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Eligibility requirements are outlined in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
--Eligibility requirements are outlined in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Technical capability requirements are outlined in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
--Technical capability requirements are outlined in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Financial requirements are outlined in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 1.daļas prasības, 1.versija.
--Financial requirements are outlined in Document: Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 2.daļas prasības, 1.versija.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 1.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
160286_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260224051325.pdf -- 95.3 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, and required documents for the replacement of 330kV overhead line supports.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta (1.posma) 2.daļas prasības, 1.versijaPDF
160286_PD.ANY_1_1_2_20260224051326.pdf -- 95.4 KB

This document outlines the requirements and selection criteria for the second part of the first stage of a tender for the replacement of high-voltage power line supports.

Nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
1.pielikums_Pieteikum.docx -- 36.2 KB

This document contains an application form and declarations for a procurement procedure concerning the replacement of 330kV overhead line poles.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for tender AST2025/156 concerning the replacement of 330kV overhead line supports, including deadlines, procurement details, and contact information.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for overhead line support replacement is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a reasonable deadline. However, concerns exist regarding document access and the specification of evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear procedure, a relevant CPV code, and no reported disputes. The deadline is reasonable for the estimated value. The procedure type 'neg-w-call' suggests a negotiated procedure without prior publication, which can be legally compliant if justified.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear. Requirements are documented within specific files, which is a standard practice. However, the absence of explicitly specified evaluation criteria within the provided summary could lead to ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria specified in summary
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, duration (implied by contract start date and performance conditions), and deadlines. However, the contract duration is not explicitly stated, and the 'AI-extracted requirements' indicate that some crucial documents might have restricted access.

Missing explicit contract duration
Potential restricted document access
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The estimated value is disclosed, and the deadline appears reasonable. However, the 'Issues' section flags restricted document access, which could hinder full document access for potential bidders and negatively impact fairness.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender utilizes e-procurement, which is practical. A document URL is implicitly available through the e-procurement system. However, the contract start date is not explicitly provided, and financing information is absent. The duration is also not explicitly stated.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and deadlines are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically ordered.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is not indicated as EU funded. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and description
E-Procurement utilized
Reasonable deadline and value disclosure
CPV code provided

Concerns

Restricted document access
Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Clarify and publish evaluation criteria.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects into future tenders.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline