Construction services for the rebuilding of a boundary/retaining wall

This tender for construction services is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on submission, impacting its completeness and practicality.

The tender adheres to basic legal requirements with a specified CPV code and a clear procedure for open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are provided, though the submission deadline might be considered tight. No disputes are reported.

The description of the service is clear, and the purpose of the expression of interest is well-defined. Technical capability requirements are outlined, but financial and submission requirements are missing, reducing overall clarity.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, value, and duration. However, the absence of specific evaluation criteria and detailed submission requirements means the documentation is not fully complete for potential bidders.

The tender is an open competition, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria, while not fully specified, are not tailored to specific companies. The lack of detailed submission requirements could be a minor concern for some.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of e-submission details and the absence of specific submission requirements reduce its practicality for bidders. Financing information is not detailed.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, indicating good data consistency.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded, suggesting a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.