Single supplier framework for the Provision of Specialist Arboricultural advice for South Downs National Park Authority Planning

This tender for specialist arboricultural advice is generally well-structured, with clear requirements and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on the submission process, impacting its overall practicality and completeness.

The tender appears to comply with basic legal requirements for an open competition below the threshold. Deadlines are specified, and the CPV code is provided. There is no indication of disputes or regulatory non-compliance in the provided data. The deadline of 25 days is on the shorter side but may be acceptable for a below-threshold procurement.

The description of the required services is clear and specific, detailing the types of arboricultural advice needed and the geographical areas of coverage. Eligibility and technical capability requirements are also well-defined.

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration. However, the absence of specific submission requirements and the lack of content in the tender documents are significant omissions.

The tender is open competition, and the estimated value is disclosed. The requirements are objective and focused on the necessary expertise. There is no indication of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the lack of information regarding e-submission and the absence of document content limit its practicality for potential bidders.

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender timeline.

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on these areas.