Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

What Works Centre for Children and Families

Open
Deadline
43 days left
May 18, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
015744-2026
Value
£85,000,000
Location
United Kingdom
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

February 20, 2026

Deadline for Questions

May 11, 2026

Submission Deadline

May 18, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 31, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£85,000,000
Duration
120 months
Location
United Kingdom
Type
Open Procedure
63
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

This is a Competition Notice for 10 years of Grant Funding for a What Works Centre for Children and Families to start in April 2027. This funding will be provided under Section 14 Grant of the Education Act 2003 Terms and Conditions. This competition is not in scope of the Procurement Act 2023. There is also a Find a Grant notice relating to this competition which can be found here: https://find-government-grants.service.gov.uk/grants/what-works-centre-for-children-and-families---competition-launch-1 The Department for Education (the Department) are looking for an organisation to act as a What Works Centre for Children and Families (WWCCF) from April 2027. This grant funding will be issued for a maximum of 10 years, with a maximum available funding of £8.5m per year. Reforming children’s social care to keep children safe and give them the best start in life is an important part of the Governments opportunity mission. Improving the evidence base on interventions that work is vital to the success of the reform programme. The Department anticipate this grant to be used to generate and champion robust actionable evidence (i.e. deliver research, programmes and evaluations) that will help shape decision making in policy and practice, and enable the sector to improve services and outcomes to protect and support vulnerable and disadvantaged children. This should include: becoming a What Works Network member, operating independently and setting a strategy alongside the Department; having access to a range of expertise in conducting high-quality evaluations, translating and disseminating evidence; establishing relationships with policy makers and local leaders to establish and support delivery of interventions that work based on high quality evidence; detailed knowledge and understanding of the children’s social care and early intervention sector. We are looking for an organisation to build a strategy which would deliver the following objectives: collating existing evidence on the effectiveness of programmes and practices; collaborating with and engaging the sector to help the development of materials and reports; producing high-quality synthesis reports and systematic reviews in areas where they do not currently exist; assessing the effectiveness of policies and practices against an agreed set of outcomes; Identifying and filling gaps in the evidence base by commissioning new trials and evaluations; proactively sharing findings in an accessible way (that is free to access); supporting practitioners, commissioners and policymakers to use these findings to inform their decisions; undertaking research and evaluation projects that meet Government Social Research standards. We would expect that Cabinet Office's requirement of What Works Centre membership to be met in full: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/what-works-network-membership-requirements. An online competition launch engagement session will be held 14:00 – 15:00 pm, 26th February 2026 via teams to allow the Department to explain relevant competition documentation to potential bidders and allow an opportunity for Q&A. If you would like an invite to this session, please use the messaging function on Jaggaer to request an invite, including the roles and email addresses of all those who would like to attend. Any slides and Q&A from this session will be uploaded and shared with all potential bidders for future reference.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

24 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (5)
Technical (13)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Request an invite to the online competition launch engagement session via the messaging function on Jaggaer.
--Include the roles and email addresses of all those who would like to attend when requesting an invite to the engagement session.
--Submit the bid by the deadline: 2026-05-18T00:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text, as this is a grant competition not in scope of the Procurement Act 2023.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--The organisation must be able to act as a What Works Centre for Children and Families (WWCCF).
--The organisation must be able to operate independently.
--The organisation must meet Cabinet Office's What Works Centre membership requirements in full (as specified at the provided external link).
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS13
--The organisation must have access to a range of expertise in conducting high-quality evaluations.
--The organisation must have access to expertise in translating evidence.
--The organisation must have access to expertise in disseminating evidence.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--None explicitly mentioned in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
63
Good

Tender Quality Score

This grant competition outlines a vital social initiative with clear objectives, but its quality is severely compromised by the critical absence of accessible tender documents and explicit evaluation criteria, hindering transparency and fair participation.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance85/100

The tender clearly defines its legal basis as a grant competition under the Education Act 2003, explicitly stating it is not in scope of the Procurement Act 2023. The CPV code is appropriate, and no disputes are noted. This clear legal positioning is a strength.

Clarity70/100

The description of the grant's purpose, objectives, and the required activities for the What Works Centre is very clear and unambiguous. The AI-extracted requirements are also well-defined. However, the critical absence of specified evaluation criteria significantly reduces overall clarity for potential applicants.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness40/100

While basic information like title, organization, value, and duration are present, the tender is critically incomplete due to the lack of content for the 4 attached documents. This means essential details for preparing a bid are unavailable. The absence of evaluation criteria also contributes to incompleteness.

No document content available for attached documents
Missing evaluation criteria
Fairness50/100

Fairness is significantly undermined by the lack of accessible full tender documents and the absence of explicit evaluation criteria. Bidders cannot understand how their proposals will be judged, nor can they access all necessary information, creating an uneven playing field. The 'No e-submission' flag also suggests potential accessibility barriers.

No full document access (documents have no content)
Missing evaluation criteria (impacts transparency and objectivity)
Practicality55/100

The tender provides key practical details like contract start date and financing. However, the lack of accessible tender documents makes it highly impractical for bidders to prepare a comprehensive submission. The absence of electronic submission capabilities is also a practical drawback in modern procurement.

No document content available (impractical for bidders)
No e-submission
Data Consistency85/100

Most key fields are populated, and dates are logical and consistent. The estimated value in EUR aligns with the stated annual funding in GBP over the duration. Minor inconsistencies include empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure', and the 'Liable Person' field is not populated.

Empty codes for 'Type' and 'Procedure'
Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability75/100

The core purpose of the grant, focusing on children's social care and supporting vulnerable children, inherently addresses significant social aspects. The emphasis on generating and championing robust evidence and filling evidence gaps also indicates an innovation focus. However, there are no explicit green procurement criteria.

No explicit green procurement criteria

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of the grant's purpose and objectives.
Strong social focus on children's social care and vulnerable children.
Reasonable timeline for submission (almost 3 months).
Value and duration are clearly specified.
Explicitly states its legal framework as a grant, not procurement.

Concerns

Critical: No content available for the attached tender documents, making it impossible for bidders to access full details.
Critical: Missing explicit evaluation criteria, which undermines transparency and fairness.
Automated check indicates 'No e-submission,' which is a practical drawback.
Liable Person field is empty.
Minor inconsistencies with empty codes for Type/Procedure.

Recommendations

1. Immediately upload and ensure accessibility of all full tender documents with content.
2. Publish clear and objective evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the submission process, ideally enabling full electronic submission.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline