Skip to main content
Tenders

Monitoring of the breeding colony of the Greater Mouse-eared Bat (Myotis myotis) in the Natura 2000 area Wejherowo PLH220084

Closed
Deadline
0 days left
March 27, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
2026/BZP 00162476/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Pomorskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 20, 2026

Submission Deadline

March 27, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Pomorskie
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€925,268
Avg. Bids
1.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
91%
34,641 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Monitoring of the breeding colony of the Greater Mouse-eared Bat (Myotis myotis) in the Natura 2000 area Wejherowo PLH220084

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de85a8-2c3a-00f0-056e-e500011b846b.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the monitoring of a greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis) breeding colony in the Natura 2000 Wejherowo area, issued by the Regional Directorate of Environmental Protection in Gdańsk.

Załączniki nr 3 do umowy Protokół odbioru.docxDOC
Załączniki nr 3 do umowy Protokół odbioru.doc...

This document is a final acceptance protocol for the "Monitoring of the breeding colony of the Greater Mouse-eared Bat (Myotis myotis) in the Natura 2000 Wejherowo PLH220084 area".

Załącznik nr 1 Opis przedmiotu zamówienia Nocek duży Wejherowo.docDOC
Załącznik nr 1 Opis przedmiotu zamówienia Noc...

This document outlines the technical specifications for monitoring the breeding colony of the Greater Mouse-eared Bat (Myotis myotis) within the Natura 2000 Wejherowo area, including methodologies, reporting requirements, and deadlines.

Załącznik nr 2 - Formularz Ofertowy.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 2 - Formularz Ofertowy.docx

This document is a bid form template for the "Monitoring of the breeding colony of the Greater Mouse-eared Bat (Myotis myotis) in the Natura 2000 Wejherowo PLH220084 area."

Załącznik nr 3 - Oświadczenie - warunki.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 3 - Oświadczenie - warunki.docx

This document contains a declaration by the bidder confirming their compliance with the participation conditions for the public procurement procedure regarding the monitoring of a large myotis bat breeding colony.

Załącznik nr 4 - Oświadczenie - wykluczenie.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 4 - Oświadczenie - wykluczenie.d...

This document contains a declaration of no grounds for exclusion from the public procurement procedure for monitoring the breeding colony of Myotis myotis in the Natura 2000 Wejherowo area.

Załącznik nr 5 - Wykaz usług.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 5 - Wykaz usług.docx

This document is a list of completed services required from the bidder to demonstrate at least two relevant services performed in the last three years, along with details and proof of proper execution.

Załącznik nr 6 - wzór umowy.pdfPDF
Załącznik nr 6 - wzór umowy.pdf

This document contains a draft contract for the monitoring of a bat colony (Myotis myotis) in the Natura 2000 Wejherowo area, specifying the subject, terms, obligations, and remuneration.

Załącznik nr 7 - Oświadczenie o braku przynależności do grupy kapitałowej.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 7 - Oświadczenie o braku przynal...

This document is a declaration by the contractor stating whether or not they belong to the same capital group as defined by Polish law, and if so, to list the entities within that group.

Załącznik nr 8 - Wzór zobowiązania.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 8 - Wzór zobowiązania.docx

This document contains a template for a bidder's commitment to provide necessary resources for the "Monitoring of the greater mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis) breeding colony in the Natura 2000 area Wejherowo PLH220084" service.

Załącznik nr 9 - Wykaz osób.docxDOC
Załącznik nr 9 - Wykaz osób.docx

This document requires the bidder to provide a list of individuals with field experience in bat inventory or monitoring, specifically for the Greater Mouse-eared bat (Myotis myotis).

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for bat colony monitoring is generally well-structured with clear documentation and e-procurement, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration and financing, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code, a specified deadline, and utilizing e-procurement. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and potential for a short submission window (8 days) could be a minor concern regarding procedural fairness.

Clarity80/100

The tender's subject matter and location are clearly described. The provided documents, including technical specifications and contract drafts, offer good detail. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the title, reference, organization, and a clear description of the service. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial details like contract duration and financing information are missing, reducing the completeness score.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender promotes fairness through e-procurement and the disclosure of a draft contract. The requirements for declarations and lists of personnel are standard. There are no apparent requirements tailored to specific companies, contributing to a good fairness score.

Practicality65/100

The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect. However, the absence of a disclosed contract start date, contract duration, and financing information makes it difficult for bidders to fully assess the practical implications of the tender. The deadline might also be perceived as short.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender's active status.

Sustainability50/100

The tender focuses on environmental monitoring, which has inherent sustainability aspects. However, there is no explicit mention of green procurement criteria, social aspects, or innovation, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear subject matter and location
Comprehensive set of required documents
E-procurement enabled
Standardized declaration forms provided

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Undisclosed estimated value
Lack of contract duration and financing details
Potentially short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Disclose the estimated contract value and duration for better bidder assessment.
3. Consider extending the submission deadline if it is indeed too short for adequate preparation.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline