Skip to main content
Tenders

Framework agreement for the development of construction concept documentation and author's supervision for buildings in the administrative territory of Dienvidkurzeme Municipality

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Services
Reference
168233
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Kurzeme, Latvia
Published
March 17, 2026
CPV Code
Evaluation Criteria
Technical Proposal60%
Financial Proposal40%
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Tender Opening

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
12 months
Location
Kurzeme
Type
Services
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€83,543
Avg. Bids
3.3
Competition
Medium
SME Winners
100%
7,536 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Framework agreement for the development of construction concept documentation and author's supervision for buildings in the administrative territory of Dienvidkurzeme Municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

12 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (5)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Bid form for the development of building construction design documentation and author supervision.
--Bidder details and proposed specialists must be provided.
--Submission deadline: 2026-04-01T08:00:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--[Information not available in provided documents]
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not available in provided documents]
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS5
--Development of construction design documentation and author supervision for building construction.
--Development of changes to an existing construction project and providing author supervision to ensure environmental accessibility.
--Expertise in developing concept documentation.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--[Information not available in provided documents]

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

11 documents available with AI summaries

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
168233_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260317051331.pdf -- 97.8 KB

This document outlines the tender requirements for the development of building construction concept documentation and author supervision in the Dienvidkurzeme municipality, including exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical and financial proposal requirements, and evaluation methods.

6.pielikums_Vispārīgā vienošanāsDOC
6.pielikums_Vispariga_Vienosanas_eku_projekte... -- 54.6 KB

This document contains a general agreement for the development of building design documentation and author supervision services, outlining the procedure for price inquiries, bid submission, and evaluation.

6.pielikuma 1.pielikums_uzaicinājuma veidlapaDOC
6.pielikums_VV_1.pielikums_Uzaicinajuma_veidl... -- 26.9 KB

This document contains an invitation to submit a proposal for the development of building design documentation and author's supervision, with the submission deadline and evaluation criteria specified.

6.pielikuma 2.pielikums_piedāvājuma veidlapaDOC
6.pielikums_VV_2.pielikums_Piedavajuma_veidla... -- 36.1 KB

This document contains a bid form for the development of building construction design documentation and author supervision, requiring bidder details and proposed specialists.

6.pielikuma 3.1.pielikums_Liguma PROJ._formaDOC
6.pielikums_VV_3.1.pielikums_Ligums_PROJEKTES... -- 160.5 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the development of construction design documentation and author supervision for a specific object, outlining the subject matter, general terms, payment procedures, and responsibilities.

6.pielikuma 3.2.pielikums Līguma_AUTOR_formaDOC
6.pielikums_VV_3.2.pielikums_Ligums_AUTORUZRA... -- 173.5 KB

This document contains a draft contract for author supervision services related to construction projects, outlining terms, responsibilities, and payment procedures.

7.pielikuma 1.pielikums_formaXLS
7PIELI~1.XLS -- 714.6 KB

This document contains a self-assessment questionnaire regarding environmental and information accessibility for the Dienvidkurzemes novada pašvaldība's social services department, related to the investment project 'Ensuring environmental accessibility at Avotu iela 2, Aizpute'.

7.pielikums_Projektēšanas uzdevumsDOC
7.pielikums__Grozijumu_Projektesanas_uzdevums... -- 75.1 KB

This document outlines the design task for developing changes to an existing construction project and providing author supervision to ensure environmental accessibility at Avotu Street 2, Aizpute, Dienvidkurzeme Municipality.

7.pielikuma 4.pielikums_skicesPDF
7.pielikums_PU_4.pielikums_rasejumi.pdf -- 1.7 MB

This document contains design sketches and visual materials for a project, including proposed general plan revisions, ramp solutions, and elevator shaft plans and foundations.

Nolikums DKNP 2026/5DOC
Nolikums_2026_5.doc -- 236.5 KB

This document contains the regulations for an open tender procedure for the development of general agreements for building design documentation and author supervision in the Dienvidkurzeme administrative territory.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for the development of design documentation and author supervision for building construction in the Dienvidkurzeme municipality.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is generally well-structured with a clear scope and mandatory documentation. However, it lacks specific financial details and evaluation criteria, and the document access is not fully transparent.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to many legal requirements, including a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and active status. Deadlines are reasonable, and the procedure is open. The main concern is the potential for restricted document access, which could affect compliance with fair procurement laws. The absence of disclosed disputes is positive.

Potential restricted document access
Clarity80/100

The description of services (design documentation and author supervision) is clear, and technical capabilities are reasonably detailed. Many supporting documents are provided, contributing to clarity. However, specific evaluation criteria for bids are not explicitly stated, leaving some ambiguity.

Missing explicit evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, organization, procedure type, and contract duration. Key documents like technical specifications, contract drafts, and forms are attached. The estimated value is not disclosed, and financial requirements are not detailed, impacting completeness.

Estimated value not disclosed
Financial requirements not detailed
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with e-procurement, which promotes fairness. Document access is stated as available, but the 'Issues: Restricted document access' flag suggests potential limitations. Objective criteria for selection are implied but not explicitly detailed. There are no immediately obvious requirements tailored to specific companies, contributing to a moderate fairness score.

Potential restricted document access
Evaluation criteria not explicitly detailed
Practicality65/100

E-submission is implied by 'Elektronisko iepirkumu sistēma' and 'E-Procurement' characteristics. Contract duration is specified. However, financing information is not provided, and the lack of a clear contract start date or specific e-submission portal details reduces practicality. The existence of multiple contract draft documents is helpful.

Financing information not disclosed
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, procedure type, and deadlines are populated. The dates are logical, and there are no reported suspensions or disputes. The CPV code is provided. The only minor inconsistency is the flagging of 'Restricted document access' under 'Issues' while documents are listed as available.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation in the tender description or characteristics. The tender is not indicated as EU funded. This focus on general construction documentation rather than specific sustainable outcomes leads to a lower score in this category.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear scope of services (design documentation and author supervision)
Open procedure and e-procurement
Comprehensive set of supporting documents (technical specs, contract drafts, forms)
Reasonable timeline and deadlines
Proper CPV code provided

Concerns

Estimated value and financial requirements not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not explicitly detailed
Potential for restricted document access
Lack of sustainability and innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Clearly detail the evaluation criteria for bid submissions.
2. Ensure full and unrestricted access to all tender documents for all potential bidders.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation criteria if applicable to the project's long-term goals.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline