Skip to main content
Tenders

Regenerative Schools Programme - Technical and Academic advisors

Open
Deadline
4 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
022808-2026
Value
£4,000,000
Location
North East England, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 13, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£4,000,000
Duration
44 months
Location
North East England
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The Department for Education (DfE) is the UK government’s Department responsible for the schools in England. As part of this role, we oversee the safety, condition, and long‑term sustainability of the education estate. This includes ensuring that current and future school buildings are provided with safe, high‑quality environments where children can learn and thrive. On 11th February 2026 the Department published its 10-year plan for the Education Estate, the Education Estates Strategy, A decade of national renewal. The Regenerative Schools Pilot was outlined within the strategy: “Testing new solutions, technologies and construction methods – we will continue to look at how we can go further for our future design specifications as part of a research and development programme supported by £33 million to 2029-30. This will prioritise regenerative approaches looking at a wide range of outcomes from energy storage to bio-based construction materials, such as timber and working closely with Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) on the Timber in Construction Road Map.” This is your opportunity to shape this cutting‑edge project, which will guide the Department’s work over the next ten years and beyond. Regenerative Schools Pilot, Introduction The Department for Education intends to research, develop, and deliver a series of single and dual classroom, ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings under the Regenerative Schools Programme. This will be accompanied by a package of landscaping and retrofit interventions which will support biodiversity, passive heat‑reduction (such as tree shading), fabric upgrades to existing buildings (cladding and windows), sustainable drainage systems and the creation of outdoor learning spaces. This programme will also produce case studies, guidance and resources for schools. As part of the Regenerative Schools Programme, the Department intends to appoint two parties in August 2026: an Innovation Lead and an Academic Adviser. These organisations will produce feasibility studies, research the building materials and techniques required to produce ultra‑low‑carbon school buildings and develop 6 standard designs. Then, in March 2027, the Department plans to appoint a contractor to deliver the works, using the materials and methods specified by the Innovation Lead and Academic Advisers. Separate market engagement and tender events will be held for the construction contractor’s appointment.   The Innovation Lead The Innovation Lead will serve as the Department’s primary technical partner, guiding the programme from its earliest feasibility work through to the delivery of completed buildings. Your work will include developing an understanding of each school site, identifying opportunities for nature‑led retrofit, and delivering 6 standardised concept designs for new single and dual external classroom pods, ultra‑low‑carbon buildings that meet demanding embodied carbon targets. You will explore and develop a range of regenerative material strategies, produce clear and accessible design material, and provide the technical direction needed to ensure that the Department’s ambitions for low embodied carbon, buildability and replicability are embedded from the outset. As the programme moves from concept into development, the Innovation Lead will take on a client‑side assurance role, overseeing the Contractor’s design under the Pre‑Contract Services Agreement and ensuring alignment with carbon targets, safety standards, and the Department’s technical requirements. During the delivery phase you will provide project management and technical assurance, monitor the quality of off‑site manufacture and on‑site installation, support statutory compliance, and ensure that handover, commissioning, and early operation run smoothly. You will also be responsible for producing technical guidance, case studies, and updated documentation so that learning from the programme can be scaled across the wider education estate. Working with the Academic Adviser The Innovation Lead and Academic Adviser are intended to operate in parallel, each with a distinct focus but with close coordination throughout. The Innovation Lead will ensure technical feasibility, safety, and low‑carbon performance, while the Academic Adviser will ensure that the programme responds to the needs and experiences of the schools and communities involved. Together you will provide the Department with the combined academic, social, and technical expertise required to develop a set of replicable, ultra‑low‑carbon solutions that are grounded in real‑world school environments and capable of informing future national delivery. Please refer to the engagement section of this notice to register for our market engagement events.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

36 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (3)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (18)
Technical (12)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must register for market engagement events.
--Separate market engagement and tender events will be held for the construction contractor's appointment, implying a distinct submission process for this role.
--No specific submission forms or templates are mentioned, suggesting bidders may need to create their own documentation based on the requirements.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific mandatory exclusion grounds are detailed in the provided text.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS18
--Must be an organisation capable of acting as an "Innovation Lead".
--Must be capable of producing feasibility studies.
--Must be capable of researching building materials and techniques for ultra-low-carbon school buildings.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS12
--Proven ability to develop ultra-low-carbon school building designs.
--Expertise in regenerative material strategies.
--Experience in developing concept designs for new single and dual external classroom pods.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--The tender value is 4,000,000 EUR.
--No other specific financial requirements are detailed in the provided text.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Regenerative Schools Programme advisors is well-structured with clear objectives and extensive technical requirements. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and detailed documentation, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender exhibits good legal compliance with a clear CPV code and a specified deadline. The procedure type is not explicitly stated, which is a minor omission. The absence of dispute information and the planning status suggest a proactive approach. Deadlines appear reasonable given the planning stage.

Clarity80/100

The description of the Regenerative Schools Programme and the roles of the Innovation Lead and Academic Adviser are exceptionally clear and detailed. The requirements are well-documented, outlining specific capabilities and responsibilities. The criteria for selection are not explicitly stated, which is a point of concern.

Evaluation criteria not specified
Completeness70/100

Basic information such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and contract duration are present. However, the tender documents themselves are not available for review, and the absence of specific evaluation criteria reduces completeness. The submission deadline is provided.

No document content available
Evaluation criteria not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and provides access to the description. The requirements are detailed and objective, focusing on capabilities rather than specific company attributes. The process encourages market engagement, suggesting a fair approach. However, the lack of explicit evaluation criteria could be a concern for bidders.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a submission deadline and contract start date. Financing information is implicitly linked to the estimated value. The contract duration is provided. However, the lack of information on e-submission and the unavailability of tender documents hinder practical assessment.

No e-submission specified
No document content available
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadlines are populated. The contract duration and start date are logical. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The planning status is consistent with the timeline.

Sustainability50/100

The tender strongly emphasizes 'regenerative approaches,' 'ultra-low-carbon school buildings,' and 'biodiversity,' indicating a significant focus on environmental sustainability. However, specific green procurement criteria, social aspects, or explicit innovation funding beyond the programme's scope are not detailed. It is not explicitly stated as EU funded.

Not explicitly EU funded
Specific social criteria not detailed

Strengths

Clear and detailed description of the programme and roles
Strong emphasis on sustainability and regenerative approaches
Well-defined technical and eligibility requirements
Good data consistency and basic information provided

Concerns

Lack of specific evaluation criteria
No tender document content available for review
No explicit mention of e-submission process
Submission deadline may be tight given the planning status

Recommendations

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria to ensure transparency.
2. Make all relevant tender documents accessible to potential bidders.
3. Clarify the e-submission process and platform.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline