Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Horticultural Supply Chain Strategic Market Engagement Project

Open
Deadline
6 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
018357-2026
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Published
March 27, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 02, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Contract Start Date

July 31, 2026

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
24 months
Location
Greater Manchester
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

The South & East Lincolnshire Councils Partnership (SELCP), comprising East Lindsey, South Holland and Boston, manages extensive areas of Public Open Space (POS) and diverse green environments across the sub region. The partnership has ambitious plans for continued maintenance, horticultural enhancement, and the long term stewardship of high quality landscapes that reflect the character and needs of our communities. As our approach to green space management continues to evolve, it is increasingly shaped by environmental sustainability, climate resilience, and best practice horticulture. This means our requirements are often bespoke and tailored to specific habitats, local conditions, and community expectations. Through this Pre Market Engagement exercise, we are seeking suppliers with proven expertise in horticulture, landscape planting, and environmental stewardship who can support a broad and varied planting programme. This includes the ability to provide resilient, high quality species; specialist materials; and advice that reflects current best practice in soil health, biodiversity enhancement, and sustainable landscape management. As a carbon conscious partnership, we particularly welcome engagement from suppliers who can demonstrate strong environmental commitments, sustainable sourcing, and low impact operational practices.

Risk Analysis

Risk analysis is not yet available for this country's tenders. Currently supported: Estonia, Poland, Lithuania, and Latvia.

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI extracts and organizes all requirements from tender documents — mandatory qualifications, technical specifications, financial conditions, and submission rules — clearly categorized so you know exactly what's needed to bid.

Login

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender is in the planning phase, seeking market engagement for horticultural supply chain services. While generally well-structured, it lacks detail on evaluation criteria and financing, and documentation is not yet available.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender is in the planning stage, so regulatory compliance is ongoing. Deadlines are provided, and the CPV code is specified. There are no immediate signs of disputes or non-compliance, but the absence of reveal date and evaluation criteria could pose future legal issues if not addressed.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The description clearly outlines the partnership's goals for horticultural enhancement and environmental stewardship. Requirements are broadly defined, focusing on expertise in horticulture, landscape planting, and environmental stewardship. However, specific technical requirements and evaluation criteria are not yet detailed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Key information such as the title, reference number, organization, and description are present. Contract duration and start dates are specified. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and no tender documents with content are available, which impacts completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Tender Documents (4 total): Documents with content/summaries: 0
Fairness85/100

The tender emphasizes seeking suppliers with proven expertise and strong environmental commitments, which is generally fair. The description of requirements being 'bespoke and tailored' suggests a need for specific capabilities, but this is framed as market engagement rather than exclusive pre-selection. The lack of disclosed value and evaluation criteria could be a concern if not clarified in later stages.

Practicality65/100

The tender is in the planning stage, and e-submission details are not yet available. The contract start date and duration are provided. Financing information is not disclosed, and the project's practicality will depend on the later release of detailed requirements and submission procedures.

No e-submission mentioned
Financing info not disclosed
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, dates, and CPV code are populated logically. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. The status 'planning' is consistent with the nature of the information provided.

Sustainability50/100

The description strongly emphasizes environmental sustainability, climate resilience, best practice horticulture, soil health, biodiversity enhancement, and sustainable landscape management. It actively welcomes suppliers with strong environmental commitments, sustainable sourcing, and low-impact practices. However, it is not explicitly stated as 'green procurement' or EU funded, and social/innovation aspects are not detailed.

Not explicitly 'green procurement'
No explicit social/innovation criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear focus on environmental sustainability and best practices
Well-defined project scope and objectives
Good data consistency in basic information

Concerns

Lack of disclosed financial value
Absence of evaluation criteria
No tender documents available for review

Recommendations

1. Specify evaluation criteria and scoring methodology.
2. Disclose estimated financial value if possible.
3. Publish tender documents as soon as available.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline