Skip to main content
Tenders

Selective renovation works in the building of Riga Secondary School No. 84 at Lielvārdes Street 141, Riga

Open
Deadline
14 days left
April 10, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
169022
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Riga, Latvia
Published
March 24, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 03, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 10, 2026

Tender Opening

April 10, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
3 months
Location
Riga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Selective renovation works in the building of Riga Secondary School No. 84 at Lielvārdes Street 141, Riga

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

6 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (2)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must submit a technical proposal and a financial proposal according to the requirements.
--The submission deadline is 2026-04-10T10:10:00.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--The bidder must not be subject to exclusion grounds as detailed in the tender documents.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must meet the eligibility criteria outlined in the tender documents.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must demonstrate technical capabilities as specified in the tender documents, including adherence to the technical specification.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Bidders must provide a financial statement declaring their net turnover in the construction sector over the past three years.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

4 documents available with AI summaries

Atklāta konkursa nolikums ar pielikumiemDOC
10.pielikums_Finanšu izziņa__1.doc -- 51.5 KB

This document contains a financial statement form for bidders to declare their net turnover in the construction sector over the past three years, as part of an open tender for renovation works.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
169022_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260324170114.pdf -- 100.8 KB

This document outlines the requirements for a tender concerning renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 84, detailing exclusion conditions, selection criteria, technical proposal requirements, and financial proposal requirements.

Tehniskā specifikācijaXLS
Lielvārdes 141__Apjomi 24.03.26 kopija.xlsx -- 137.6 KB

This document contains a cost estimate (tāme) for renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 84, detailing the object name, address, and total construction costs.

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains the basic data for an open tender for renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 84, with a submission deadline of April 10, 2026.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for renovation works at Riga Secondary School No. 84 is generally well-structured, with clear documentation and a reasonable process. However, the estimated value is undisclosed, and specific evaluation criteria are missing, impacting fairness and completeness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure with a clear CPV code and location. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission date. No disputes are noted. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the provided information, but specific details are not elaborated.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, and the attached documents (technical specification, requirements, and tender rules) provide detailed information. However, the absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity regarding how bids will be assessed.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the organization, reference, and duration. However, the estimated value of the contract is not disclosed, which is a significant omission. While documents are available, the lack of value disclosure impacts overall completeness.

Estimated Value: Not disclosed
Fairness85/100

The tender utilizes an open procedure and e-procurement, promoting fairness. The requirements are generally objective, focusing on exclusion grounds, eligibility, technical capability, and financial statements. The main concern is the lack of disclosed evaluation criteria, which could lead to perceived bias.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement, which is positive. However, the specific URL for e-submission is not provided in the basic information, and financing details are absent. The contract duration is specified.

No e-submission URL provided
Financing information not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and dates are populated logically. There are no noted suspensions or disputes. The timeline appears consistent.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is not indicated as EU funded. Therefore, sustainability aspects are not addressed.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear open procedure and e-procurement
Detailed technical and requirement documents provided
Reasonable submission deadline and contract duration
CPV code and location clearly specified

Concerns

Estimated contract value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria are not specified
No explicit sustainability or innovation requirements
Missing e-submission URL and financing details

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated contract value to enhance transparency.
2. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bid assessment.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability or innovation elements if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline