Legal Compliance55/100
The absence of a tender reveal date and, more critically, the lack of specified evaluation criteria are significant legal compliance issues. While the procedure type and CPV code are appropriate, these omissions undermine transparency and legal soundness.
•Missing tender reveal date
•No evaluation criteria specified
Clarity70/100
The project description, lot structure, and specialisms are clearly articulated. However, the critical absence of detailed evaluation criteria significantly reduces the overall clarity for potential bidders.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness65/100
Most basic information, including title, reference, organization, value, deadline, and duration, is provided. However, the lack of detailed evaluation criteria is a major gap in the tender's completeness.
•No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness45/100
The absence of evaluation criteria is a fundamental fairness issue, preventing objective assessment. The missing tender reveal date and lack of e-submission also hinder equal access and preparation time. The complex and restrictive lot combination rules, while intended for risk management, could inadvertently limit competition.
•No evaluation criteria specified
•Missing tender reveal date
Practicality55/100
The lack of electronic submission (e-submission) is a significant practical drawback. Furthermore, the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline is illogical and practically unfeasible, indicating a procedural flaw.
•No e-submission
•Illogical contract start date (same as submission deadline)
Data Consistency50/100
The most significant inconsistency is the contract start date being identical to the submission deadline, which is illogical. The 'Liable Person' field is also empty, though this is a minor issue.
•Contract start date is identical to submission deadline
•Liable Person field is empty
Sustainability35/100
The tender does not explicitly incorporate green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus, which is a missed opportunity for a project of this scale and nature.
•Not green procurement
•No social criteria