Skip to main content
Tenders

Combined design, construction and supervision for the project 'Creation of sorted waste collection sites in Sigulda municipality'

Open
Deadline
10 days left
April 07, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
166842
Value
€307,465
Location
Pieriga, Latvia
Published
March 18, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 18, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 31, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 07, 2026

Tender Opening

April 07, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
€307,465
Duration
12 months
Location
Pieriga
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€491,981
Avg. Bids
3.0
Competition
Low
SME Winners
99%
20,606 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Combined design, construction and supervision for the project 'Creation of sorted waste collection sites in Sigulda municipality'
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

13 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (5)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (2)
Technical (3)
Financial (2)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS5
--Bids must be submitted in Latvian.
--Bids must be submitted by the deadline: 2026-04-07T09:00:00.
--Bids must include all required documentation as specified in the tender documents.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders must not be subject to exclusion grounds as defined by Latvian law.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must be legally registered entities.
--Bidders must possess the necessary permits and licenses for design, construction, and supervision.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Bidders must demonstrate experience in similar projects (design, construction, and supervision of waste collection sites).
--Bidders must provide a qualified team of specialists for design, construction, and supervision.
--Bidders must submit a detailed technical proposal outlining their approach to the project.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS2
--Bidders must demonstrate sufficient financial capacity to undertake the project.
--Bidders must provide financial statements for the past [number] years.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

7 documents available with AI summaries

10.pielikums_PU_Gaujaslīču_iela-40B_Gaujā_Inčukalna_pag_Siguldas_nov_v2DOC
10.pielikums_PU_Gaujaslīču_iela-40B_Gaujā_Inč... -- 49.9 KB

This document contains the design task for the procurement of combined design, construction, and supervision for the creation of sorted waste collection areas in Sigulda municipality.

10.pielikums_PU_Ķiršu_iela-24_Mālpils_Mālpils_pag_Siguldas_nov_v2DOC
10.pielikums_PU_Ķiršu_iela-24_Mālpils_Mālpils... -- 49.8 KB

This document contains the design task for the joint design, construction, and supervision of sorted waste collection areas in Sigulda municipality.

10.pielikums_PU_Ķiršu_iela-24_Mālpils_Mālpils_pag_Siguldas_nov_v2DOC
10.pielikums_PU_Ķiršu_iela-24_Mālpils_Mālpils... -- 49.8 KB

This document contains the design task for the combined design, construction, and supervision of sorted waste collection areas in Sigulda municipality.

11.pielikums_Līguma projektsDOC
11.pielikums_Līguma projekts.docx -- 61.1 KB

This document contains a draft contract for the joint design, construction, and author supervision of sorted waste collection sites in Sigulda municipality.

Iepirkuma priekšmeta prasības, 1.versijaPDF
166842_PD.ANY_1_1_1_20260318102439.pdf -- 99.0 KB

This document outlines the requirements for bidders participating in a procurement process for the design, construction, and supervision of sorted waste collection sites in Sigulda municipality.

Nolikums SNP 2026_26_AKDOC
Nolikums SNP 2026_26_AK (3).DOC -- 2.6 MB

No content extracted

Main tender pageHTM
index.html

This document contains basic data for an open competition procurement concerning the joint design, construction, and supervision of segregated waste collection sites in Sigulda municipality, funded by EU and local budgets.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for waste collection site development in Sigulda municipality is generally well-structured, with clear technical specifications and a reasonable estimated value. However, concerns exist regarding the accessibility of all tender documents and the explicit absence of defined evaluation criteria.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure, proper CPV code, and no reported disputes. Deadlines appear reasonable within the context of the submission period. Regulatory compliance is assumed based on the active status and procedure type.

Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, and the technical specifications for the waste collection sites are documented. The conditions for performance are referenced to technical specifications and contract drafts, indicating a good level of clarity for bidders who can access these documents.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including deadlines, value, and duration. However, the AI flags 'Restricted document access' and 'No evaluation criteria specified' which impacts completeness, suggesting that not all necessary information for a bid might be readily available or transparently presented.

Restricted document access
No evaluation criteria specified
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure with a disclosed value and uses e-procurement, which promotes fairness. The requirements, as extracted, appear objective and related to the project's needs. However, the 'Restricted document access' issue could potentially limit full document access for some bidders.

Restricted document access
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-submission and provides a contract start date implicitly through the duration. Financing information is indicated as EU funded. However, the AI flags 'No e-submission', which contradicts the 'E-Procurement' characteristic, suggesting a potential discrepancy or a misunderstanding of the submission mechanism.

No e-submission (contradicts E-Procurement characteristic)
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported suspensions or disputes. The dates provided (Reveal, Submission, Opening) are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain EU standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, leading to a moderate score in this category.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear project description and technical specifications
Open procedure with disclosed estimated value
Use of e-procurement system
Logical and populated key tender data

Concerns

Potential restricted access to some tender documents
Absence of explicitly stated evaluation criteria
Discrepancy regarding e-submission

Recommendations

1. Ensure all tender documents are fully accessible to all potential bidders.
2. Clearly define and publish the evaluation criteria to enhance transparency and fairness.
3. Clarify the e-submission process to avoid confusion.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline