Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Poland – Tape memory units – Delivery of computer equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow (DZP.260.16.2026)

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 28, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/S 60-210366
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Poland
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 26, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 21, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 28, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
6 months
Location
Poland
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€239,847
Avg. Bids
0.5
Competition
Low
SME Winners
97%
25,440 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Poland – Tape memory units – Delivery of computer equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow (DZP.260.16.2026)

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

AI-powered analysis of this tender's requirements, opportunities, and challenges. Get strategic insights to maximize your win probability.

65%
Estimated Win ProbabilityModerate Fit

This tender requires the supply of computer equipment, specifically tape drives and laptops, for the Institute of Nuclear Physics in Krakow. Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria and the absence of green/social/innovative aspects, the winning strategy will focus on a highly competitive price, robust technical compliance, and efficient delivery within the 6-month timeframe. Demonstrating reliability and a clear understanding of the technical specifications will be paramount.

Key Winning Messages

Competitive Pricing for High-Quality IT Hardware

Reliable and Timely Delivery of Essential Research Equipment

Uncompromising Technical Compliance and Product Quality

Key Opportunities
Lack of specified evaluation criteria presents an opportunity to influence perceived value through competitive pricing and clear technical compliance.
The inclusion of a CPU performance list (Passmark CPU.pdf) suggests a focus on performance, allowing bidders to highlight hardware that exceeds minimum requirements at a competitive price point.
The short 6-month duration indicates a need for efficient logistics and supply chain management, which can be a differentiator.
Key Challenges
Absence of detailed technical specifications for tape drives and laptops creates ambiguity and a risk of non-compliance if assumptions are incorrect.

Proactively seek clarification from the contracting authority regarding specific technical requirements for both tape drives and laptops. If clarification is not possible, propose solutions that meet or exceed industry standards for similar research environments, clearly documenting any assumptions made.

The estimated value is not disclosed, making it difficult to gauge the expected price range and competitive landscape.

Conduct thorough market research to understand typical pricing for similar tape drives and laptops in the Polish market. Leverage past tender data if available. Prepare a pricing strategy that is aggressive but sustainable, aiming for a balance between winning the bid and profitability.

The lack of specified evaluation criteria means the weighting of price vs. technical merit is unknown, potentially leading to a price-driven award.

Prioritize a highly competitive price while ensuring all mandatory technical requirements are met. If technical aspects are implicitly important, ensure the proposed hardware is of reputable brands and meets or exceeds common performance benchmarks (e.g., using data from Passmark CPU.pdf).

Ideal Bidder Profile
A well-established IT hardware supplier with a proven track record in public procurement in Poland, possessing strong relationships with manufacturers of tape drives and laptops. The ideal bidder will have efficient supply chain management, competitive pricing structures, and the capacity to meet delivery deadlines. Experience with academic or research institutions would be a significant advantage.
Key Requirements
Supply of Tape Drives (CPV: 30233160)
Supply of Laptops
Delivery within 6 months
Compliance with Mandatory Exclusion Grounds
Accurate and complete pricing submission as per Zalacznik_nr_3.docx
Key Discriminators
Exceptional price competitiveness coupled with guaranteed delivery within the 6-month timeframe.
Demonstrated understanding of the specific needs of a nuclear physics institute, even if not explicitly stated, by proposing appropriate hardware configurations.
A clear and error-free submission, particularly the pricing form, showcasing attention to detail and professionalism.
Social Value Opportunities
While not a requirement, consider a commitment to local employment or training opportunities within the Krakow region as a subtle differentiator, if feasible without impacting cost significantly. This could be framed as supporting the local IT ecosystem.
Bid Focus Areas
Price

Submit the most competitive price possible while ensuring profitability. Leverage bulk purchasing power and efficient supply chains. Clearly itemize costs in Zalacznik_nr_3.docx.

Technical Compliance

Propose hardware that demonstrably meets or exceeds industry standards for research environments. Clearly list all proposed specifications, referencing the Passmark CPU.pdf where applicable. Ensure all mandatory exclusion grounds are addressed.

Delivery Timeline

Provide a clear and confident delivery plan demonstrating the ability to meet the 6-month deadline. Highlight any logistical advantages or existing stock.

Recommendations6
Clarify Technical Specifications
Critical[winning_strategy.effort_Medium]

Proactively seek detailed technical specifications for both tape drives and laptops from the contracting authority. This is crucial to avoid non-compliance and ensure the proposed equipment meets the institute's needs.

High - Prevents disqualification and ensures a relevant bid.
Aggressive Pricing Strategy
Critical[winning_strategy.effort_High]

Given the lack of specified evaluation criteria, assume price will be a significant factor. Develop a highly competitive pricing model, leveraging supply chain efficiencies and manufacturer relationships.

High - Increases chances of winning a price-sensitive tender.
Demonstrate Supply Chain Reliability
High[winning_strategy.effort_Medium]

Highlight the bidder's robust supply chain and logistics capabilities to assure the contracting authority of timely delivery within the 6-month window. Provide evidence of past successful deliveries of similar scale.

Medium - Builds confidence and differentiates from less experienced bidders.
Meticulous Pricing Form Completion
Critical[winning_strategy.effort_High]

Ensure Zalacznik_nr_3.docx is completed with absolute accuracy and attention to detail. Any errors or omissions in the pricing form can lead to disqualification.

Critical - Direct impact on bid validity.
Contingency Planning for Hardware Availability
High[winning_strategy.effort_Medium]

Develop contingency plans for potential hardware shortages or lead time extensions from manufacturers. Identify alternative suppliers or models that can be substituted if necessary, while maintaining technical compliance.

Medium - Mitigates risk of delivery delays.
Consider Local Community Engagement
Low[winning_strategy.effort_Low]

If feasible and cost-neutral, include a statement about supporting local employment or IT initiatives in Krakow. This is a low-priority differentiator given the tender's focus.

Low - Minor positive perception boost.
Competitive Positioning
Position as the most cost-effective solution without compromising on essential technical performance and delivery reliability. Emphasize a streamlined procurement process and a proven ability to meet tight deadlines, leveraging the 6-month duration as a key advantage.

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

10 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8ad5-6cbc-d996-5fad-950001bddae5.pdf

This document contains a tender notice for the supply of computer equipment, specifically tape drives and laptops, for the Institute of Nuclear Physics in Krakow, Poland.

Passmark CPU.pdfPDF
Passmark CPU.pdf

This document contains a list of CPU models with their performance ranks and prices, likely for hardware procurement.

SWZ_sprzet_komputerowy.docxDOC
SWZ_sprzet_komputerowy.docx

This document contains the terms of reference for a public tender concerning the supply of computer equipment, including a tape library and laptops, for the Institute of Nuclear Physics in Krakow.

Zalacznik_nr_1A.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_1A.docx

This document contains technical specifications for the delivery of a tape library as part of a tender for computer equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow.

Zalacznik_nr_1B.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_1B.docx

This document outlines the technical specifications for the delivery of 4 portable computers with MS Windows operating system for IFJ PAN in Krakow.

Zalacznik_nr_2.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_2.docx

This document is a bid form template for a public procurement tender concerning the supply of computer equipment, requiring bidders to provide company details, payment terms, and declarations.

Zalacznik_nr_3.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_3.docx

This document contains a price form template for submitting a bid, requiring bidders to detail unit prices, quantities, net and gross values, and VAT rates for the supply of computer equipment.

Zalacznik_nr_4.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_4.docx

This document contains a bidder's declaration regarding exclusion grounds related to EU sanctions against Russia and national security, to be submitted for the supply of computer equipment.

Zalacznik_nr_5A.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_5A.docx

This document contains the essential provisions of a public procurement contract for the delivery of tape drives and computer equipment for the Institute of Nuclear Physics of the Polish Academy of Sciences in Krakow.

Zalacznik_nr_5B.docxDOC
Zalacznik_nr_5B.docx

This document contains the essential provisions of a contract for the delivery of computer equipment, detailing the subject of the contract, delivery terms, payment conditions, and penalties for non-performance.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for computer equipment for IFJ PAN in Krakow is generally well-structured with accessible documentation, but lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on financing, impacting its overall practicality and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, with a clear procedure and attached documents. The CPV code is provided. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria and potential issues with the submission deadline's reasonableness could be points of concern.

Missing evaluation criteria specified
Deadline may be too short
Clarity80/100

The tender provides a clear title, reference, and description of the required goods. Technical specifications for the tape library and laptops are available. However, the lack of detailed eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements leaves some ambiguity for potential bidders.

Eligibility requirements not specified
Technical capability requirements not specified
Completeness70/100

Most essential information is present, including the organization, title, and contract duration. A good number of documents are attached, covering technical specifications, contract drafts, and forms. However, the estimated value is not disclosed, and crucial requirement details are missing.

Estimated Value not disclosed
Mandatory exclusion grounds not specified
Fairness85/100

The tender offers full access to documents and utilizes e-procurement. The value is disclosed as 'Not disclosed' which is a weakness. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could lead to perceived unfairness. However, there are no obvious signs of tailoring requirements to specific companies.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is marked as 'E-Procurement', suggesting e-submission. However, the 'No e-submission' flag in the checks contradicts this. The contract start date is not specified, and financing information is absent, reducing its practicality for bidders needing to plan resources.

No e-submission (contradictory flag)
Contract start date not specified
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields like title, reference, organization, and contract duration are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions. Dates are logically presented, with a submission deadline well before the contract duration. The CPV code is provided.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Submission deadline specified
CPV code provided
Comprehensive set of attached documents

Concerns

Missing crucial requirement details (eligibility, technical, financial)
Estimated value not disclosed
Evaluation criteria not specified
Lack of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify detailed eligibility, technical capability, and financial requirements.
2. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
3. Clearly outline the evaluation criteria for bids.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline