Skip to main content
Tenders

Reconstruction of internal road on plot no. 235 in the Piątki area, Nidzica municipality

Open
Deadline
11 days left
April 08, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Construction
Reference
2026/BZP 00157596/01
Value
Not disclosed
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
Organization
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 17, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 01, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 08, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
Not disclosed
Duration
Not specified
Location
Warmińsko-Mazurskie
Type
Construction
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€12,641,706
Avg. Bids
0.1
Competition
Low
SME Winners
86%
133,693 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Reconstruction of internal road on plot no. 235 in the Piątki area, Nidzica municipality

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

2 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de83fb-6a51-1dc6-056e-e500011b6554.pdf

This document is a public procurement notice for the reconstruction of an internal road on plot no. 235 in Piątki, Nidzica municipality, Poland.

Zal 18 do SWZ Kosztorys ofertowy.docxDOC
Zal 18 do SWZ Kosztorys ofertowy.docx

No content extracted

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for road reconstruction is generally well-structured with a clear description and ample documentation. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on contract duration, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by providing a clear CPV code, organization details, and a submission deadline. The procedure is not specified, which is a minor omission. No disputes are indicated. The deadline appears reasonable given the scope.

Clarity80/100

The description of the road reconstruction is clear, detailing the type of pavement and dimensions. The attached documents, though not fully summarized, suggest detailed technical specifications are available. However, evaluation criteria are missing, which hinders clarity on how bids will be assessed.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, and deadline. The estimated value is not disclosed, and the contract duration is not specified, which are significant omissions. A substantial number of documents are attached, indicating a good level of detail.

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The tender is conducted via e-procurement, promoting accessibility. The value is not disclosed, which is a concern for transparency. The criteria for evaluation are not specified, which could lead to subjective assessments. No requirements appear tailored to specific companies.

Value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Practicality65/100

The tender is active and uses e-procurement. However, the contract start date is not specified, and the financing information is absent. The lack of explicit e-submission instructions, despite being an e-procurement process, is a minor point. The duration of the contract is also missing.

Missing contract start date
Missing financing information
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, and deadline are populated. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical. The lack of a reveal date is a minor inconsistency.

Missing reveal date
Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the tender notice. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement mentioned
No social criteria mentioned

Strengths

Clear description of works
Ample attached documentation
E-procurement utilized
Clear CPV code and location

Concerns

Estimated value not disclosed
Missing evaluation criteria
Missing contract duration and start date
Lack of sustainability focus

Recommendations

1. Disclose the estimated value of the contract.
2. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
3. Include details on contract duration and start date.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline