Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Baggage Factory East - Tender for Main Contract (BUILD)

Open
Deadline
13 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
00192343-2026
Value
kr500,000,000
Location
Hovedstaden, Denmark
Published
March 28, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Budget
kr500,000,000
Duration
Not specified
Location
Hovedstaden
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Baggage Factory East (BFE) comprises the construction of a new building for handling and storage of baggage in an automatic high-bay warehouse. The BFE building will be located east of the existing Baggage Factory 3 (BF3) and must meet future capacity needs at Copenhagen Airport (hereinafter CPH). To minimize project risks and optimize the project timeline, CPH will carry out several preparatory works concerning supplies and preparation of the construction site prior to this tendered contract, so that

Run Risk Analysis

Identify potential risks, inconsistencies, and red flags across all tender documents. Get a detailed risk report with severity levels and mitigation recommendations.

Login

Win Strategy

Get an AI-powered winning strategy tailored to this tender. Includes win probability score, key opportunities and challenges, recommended bid focus areas, competitive positioning insights, and actionable recommendations to maximize your chances.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

16 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (4)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (9)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS4
--Applications for pre-qualification must be submitted.
--The tender documents will only be published for pre-qualified bidders after the pre-qualification result has been communicated.
--The timeline for the tender will be revised when the tender documents are published.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--Bidders may be excluded if they are subject to mandatory exclusion grounds as per the Defence and Security Directive (Directive 2009/81/EC).
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS9
--Any economic operator can apply for pre-qualification.
--Only pre-qualified bidders have the right to submit an offer.
--Applicants must submit a completed ESPD as documentation of suitability.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but implied to be assessed during pre-qualification based on the ESPD and supporting documents.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--Not explicitly detailed in the provided text, but implied to be assessed during pre-qualification based on the ESPD and supporting documents.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

Get AI-generated summaries of all tender documents. Quickly understand what each document contains without reading hundreds of pages — covering scope, conditions, evaluation criteria, and key obligations.

Login
75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for the 'Bagage Factory East' project is an open procedure with a pre-qualification stage, utilizing the Defence and Security Directive. While generally well-structured, it lacks explicit evaluation criteria and details on sustainability aspects.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to the Defence and Security Directive, indicating a structured legal framework. The use of an open procedure with pre-qualification is standard. However, the absence of specified evaluation criteria is a notable omission. Deadlines are present but could be considered tight given the pre-qualification step.

Missing evaluation criteria
Clarity80/100

The description of the project is clear, outlining the purpose and location of the Baggage Factory East. The pre-qualification process and required documents (ESPD, NDA) are well-defined. The distinction between the build and baggage system tracks is also helpful.

Completeness70/100

Key information such as estimated value, CPV code, and organization is present. The submission deadline is provided. However, crucial details like the contract start date, duration, and the content of the tender documents are not fully accessible at this stage, impacting completeness.

Missing contract start date
Missing contract duration
Fairness85/100

The procedure is open to any economic operator for pre-qualification, promoting broad participation. The use of ESPD and NDA is standard. The disclosure of the estimated value is positive. The main concern is the lack of transparency regarding evaluation criteria, which could affect perceived fairness.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement, which is a positive aspect. However, the URL for external tender documents is provided, but the actual content is not immediately accessible. The absence of a clear contract start date and duration limits practical planning for bidders.

Tender document content not immediately accessible
Missing contract start date
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, estimated value, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and NUTS code are present. There are no indications of suspension or disputes. The dates provided are logical within the context of the tender.

Sustainability50/100

The tender document does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. This suggests a lack of emphasis on sustainability criteria within the current tender information.

No explicit mention of green procurement
No explicit mention of social aspects

Strengths

Clear project description and objectives
Use of e-procurement
Open procedure with pre-qualification
Estimated value and CPV code disclosed

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Limited access to full tender document content
Lack of explicit sustainability considerations
Potentially tight submission deadline for pre-qualification

Recommendations

1. Publish detailed evaluation criteria for pre-qualification and final offers.
2. Provide full access to all tender documents, including templates and detailed specifications, at the earliest opportunity.
3. Incorporate and clearly state sustainability objectives and criteria.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline