Skip to main content
Tenders

Anaesthetic Software Management

Open
Deadline
24 days left
April 20, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
025492-2026
Value
£250,000
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 19, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 13, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 20, 2026

Budget
£250,000
Duration
36 months
Location
Surrey, East and West Sussex
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

Provision of Anaesthetic Information Management System

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific requirements listed.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for Anaesthetic Software Management is generally well-structured with clear basic information and a disclosed value. However, it lacks specific details on evaluation criteria and submission requirements, impacting completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to general legal compliance by having a clear procedure (Open procedure) and a proper CPV code. No disputes are reported. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The absence of a reveal date is a minor procedural oversight.

Missing reveal date
Clarity80/100

The title, description, and basic information are clear. The CPV code is specified. However, the lack of documented requirements, especially regarding evaluation criteria and submission details, reduces overall clarity.

No evaluation criteria specified
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including value, duration, and deadline. However, the critical absence of specific requirements (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and the lack of content in the attached documents significantly detract from completeness.

No specific requirements listed
No document content available
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, promoting fairness. The value is disclosed, and the criteria for selection are not tailored to specific companies, suggesting a fair process. The use of e-procurement is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies e-procurement and provides a contract start date implicitly through the deadline. However, the lack of explicit e-submission details and the absence of financing information limit practicality. The deadline might be considered short for comprehensive preparation.

No e-submission details
Deadline may be too short
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, deadline, and CPV code are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates are logically presented.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention green procurement, social aspects, or innovation. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which are common areas for sustainability considerations in public tenders.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title and reference number
Organization and description provided
Value and deadline specified
Proper CPV code included
E-procurement utilized

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria
Lack of specific requirements (eligibility, technical, financial, submission)
No content in tender documents
Potential for a short submission deadline
Absence of sustainability considerations

Recommendations

1. Specify clear evaluation criteria to enhance clarity and fairness.
2. Provide detailed requirements for all categories (exclusion, eligibility, technical, financial, submission) and ensure tender documents contain relevant content.
3. Consider incorporating sustainability aspects (green, social, innovation) if applicable.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline