Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Accommodation and Support Services

Open
Deadline
18 days left
April 15, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Other
Reference
020348-2026
Value
£80,000,000
Location
Outer London - West and North West, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 08, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 15, 2026

Contract Start Date

March 01, 2027

Buyer IntelligencePRO
🔒
Unlock Buyer Intelligence
See spending patterns, preferred procedures, and more.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
£80,000,000
Duration
49 months
Location
Outer London - West and North West
Type
Other
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

GO Reference: GO-202635-PRO-35045781 GO Reference: GO-202635-PRO-35045785 GO Reference: GO-202635-PRO-35045787 GO Reference: GO-202635-PRO-35045791 GO Reference: GO-202635-PRO-35045816 GO Reference: GO-202635-PRO-35045818 GO Reference: GO-202635-PRO-35046096

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

AI requirements analysis not yet available for this tender.

Requirements will be generated automatically when tender documents are processed.

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for accommodation and support services is well-structured with clear basic information and financial details. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on document content, impacting its overall completeness and practicality.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including a proper CPV code and no reported disputes. The deadline, while potentially short, is specified. The procedure type is missing, which is a minor oversight.

Procedure type is not specified.
Clarity80/100

The title, organization, and CPV code are clear. The description is minimal, relying heavily on GO references which may not be directly accessible. The absence of specified evaluation criteria is a significant clarity issue.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including estimated value, duration, and start date. However, the lack of accessible document content and the absence of specified evaluation criteria reduce its completeness.

No document content available for review.
Evaluation criteria are missing.
Fairness85/100

The tender discloses the estimated value and has a specified deadline. The criteria for evaluation are not disclosed, which could impact fairness. The reliance on GO references suggests a standard e-procurement process, but specific details are absent.

Evaluation criteria are not specified.
Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, it lacks information on financing and the method of e-submission is not explicitly detailed. The absence of accessible document content also hinders practical assessment.

No explicit mention of financing.
E-submission method not detailed.
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

There is no explicit mention of green procurement, social aspects, innovation, or EU funding, which are common elements in modern tenders. This suggests a lack of focus on sustainability criteria.

No green procurement considerations mentioned.
No social criteria mentioned.

Strengths

Clear basic information and financial details.
Proper CPV code provided.
Logical date sequencing.
Estimated value and duration specified.

Concerns

Missing evaluation criteria.
No accessible document content.
Lack of sustainability considerations.
Potentially short submission deadline.

Recommendations

1. Specify clear and objective evaluation criteria.
2. Provide accessible content or summaries for all tender documents.
3. Incorporate sustainability and social value aspects into the tender requirements.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline