Skip to main content
Tenders

Delivery of medical equipment for the Independent Municipal Public Health Care Facility (SGPZOZ) in Błonie (task divided into parts A-E).

Open
Deadline
5 days left
April 01, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Supplies
Reference
2026/BZP 00167789/01
Value
zł200,603
Location
Warszawski stołeczny, Poland
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 24, 2026

Deadline for Questions

March 25, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 01, 2026

Win ProbabilityPRO
🔒
Upgrade to Professional
See your estimated win probability based on historical data.
Upgrade to Professional →
Sector InsightsPRO
🔒
Unlock Sector Insights
See average winning prices, competition levels, and market trends.
Upgrade to Professional →
Budget
zł200,603
Duration
3 months
Location
Warszawski stołeczny
Type
Supplies
75
Quality Score/100
Good
Market Benchmark
Avg. Winning Price
€57,338
Avg. Bids
1.4
Competition
Low
SME Winners
78%
293,505 tenders analyzed

Original Tender Description

Delivery of medical equipment for the Independent Municipal Public Health Care Facility (SGPZOZ) in Błonie (task divided into parts A-E).
EU Funded

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

5 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (1)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No information
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No information
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No information

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

5 documents available with AI summaries

Notice PDFPDF
08de8949-7f30-d082-056e-e50001aaa2b0.pdf

This document is a tender notice for the supply of medical equipment to the Independent Municipal Public Healthcare Center (SGPZOZ) in Błonie, divided into parts A-E, and requires electronic submission of bids.

2026-01- SWZ medyczne A- E.pdfPDF
2026-01- SWZ medyczne A- E.pdf

This document contains the Specification of Conditions of Tender (SWZ) for the supply of medical equipment to the Independent Communal Public Healthcare Center in Błonie, divided into five parts (A-E).

2026-01- Umowa medyczne A-E.pdfPDF
2026-01- Umowa medyczne A-E.pdf

This document contains a draft contract for the supply of medical equipment to a public healthcare facility, outlining the obligations of both the contracting authority and the contractor.

Zał. nr 5 do Oferty.pdfPDF
Zał. nr 5 do Oferty.pdf

This document is a form for bidders to provide information about the medical equipment they are offering, including specifications and supporting documentation, to fulfill the tender requirements for SGPZOZ in Błonie.

Zał. nr 6 do Oferty_Cennik.pdfPDF
Zał. nr 6 do Oferty_Cennik.pdf

This document contains a price calculation form (price list) for the supply of medical equipment for SGPZOZ in Błonie, which bidders must fill out based on the parts of the tender they are applying for.

Documents Preview

Sign up to view document summaries and analysis

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for medical equipment is generally well-structured with clear documentation and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific evaluation criteria and details on mandatory exclusion and eligibility requirements, impacting its overall completeness and fairness.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender appears to comply with general procurement regulations, including the use of a proper CPV code and being EU funded. The procedure is not explicitly stated as 'open' or 'restricted', but the absence of specific restrictions suggests a standard procedure. The deadline, while short, is within typical parameters for this type of procurement. No disputes are indicated.

Clarity80/100

The tender title and description are clear, and the division into parts (A-E) is well-defined. The attached documents, including specifications (OPZ) for each part and form templates, provide good detail. However, the absence of explicit evaluation criteria leaves some ambiguity for bidders.

Missing evaluation criteria
Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including the estimated value, contract duration, and CPV code. A significant number of documents are attached, providing specifications and templates. However, crucial sections like mandatory exclusion grounds, eligibility requirements, technical capability, and financial requirements are marked as 'No information', significantly impacting completeness.

Missing mandatory exclusion grounds
Missing eligibility requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is divided into parts, allowing for broader participation. The estimated value is disclosed, and e-procurement is indicated. The availability of all necessary documents, including specifications and draft contract, promotes transparency. However, the lack of specified evaluation criteria could lead to subjective assessments.

No evaluation criteria specified
Practicality65/100

The tender is indicated as 'E-Procurement', suggesting electronic submission. The contract duration of 3 months is specified. However, the 'contract start date' is not explicitly mentioned, and financing information is limited to the estimated value. The short submission deadline might also pose a practical challenge.

Contract start date not specified
Short submission deadline
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference number, organization, value, and deadline are populated. The CPV code and NUTS code are present. Dates appear logical, and there are no indications of suspension or disputes. The tender status is 'active'.

Sustainability50/100

The tender is marked as 'EU Funded', which often implies adherence to certain standards. However, there are no explicit mentions of green procurement, social aspects, or innovation within the provided information, limiting its sustainability score.

No explicit green procurement criteria
No explicit social criteria

Strengths

Clear division into parts (A-E)
Comprehensive set of attached documents (specifications, forms, draft contract)
EU Funded status
E-Procurement indicated

Concerns

Missing mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements
Absence of specified evaluation criteria
Short submission deadline

Recommendations

1. Clearly define and publish mandatory exclusion, eligibility, technical, and financial requirements.
2. Specify the evaluation criteria to ensure transparency and fairness in the selection process.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline