Skip to main content
Looking to bid on government tenders? See our TaaS tender preparation service
Tenders

Former House of Fraser Refurbishment Works

Open
Deadline
20 days left
April 17, 2026
Contract Details
Category
Open Procedure
Reference
020351-2026
Value
£6,000,000
Location
East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire, United Kingdom
Published
March 20, 2026
CPV Code
Project Timeline

Tender Published

March 06, 2026

Deadline for Questions

April 10, 2026

Submission Deadline

April 17, 2026

Contract Start Date

June 30, 2026

Budget
£6,000,000
Duration
10 months
Location
East Yorkshire and Northern Lincolnshire
Type
Open Procedure
75
Quality Score/100
Good

Original Tender Description

North East Lincolnshire Borough Council (The Employer) are seeking one contractor to undertake internal ground floor refurbishment works on the former House of Fraser building, Grimsby, to provide a shell which will support a future tenant to commence their fit out.

Risk Analysis

Please log in to use risk analysis.

Login

Win Strategy

Please log in to access winning strategy recommendations.

Login

Competitors

Upgrade to see which companies are likely to bid on this tender, based on historical procurement data.

Login

Requirements & Qualifications

7 requirements across 5 categories

Submission (1)
Mandatory (1)
Compliance (3)
Technical (1)
Financial (1)
SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific submission requirements listed.
MANDATORY EXCLUSION GROUNDS1
--No specific grounds listed, but bidders should be aware of standard exclusion criteria.
ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS3
--Must be a single contractor.
--Must be capable of undertaking internal ground floor refurbishment works.
--Must be able to provide a shell to support a future tenant's fit out.
TECHNICAL CAPABILITY REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific technical capability requirements listed.
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS1
--No specific financial requirements listed.

Requirements Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Documents

No processed documents available for this tender.

Documents will appear here once they are downloaded and analyzed.

75
Good

Tender Quality Score

This tender for refurbishment works is generally well-structured, with clear basic information and a reasonable estimated value. However, it lacks specific details on technical and financial requirements, and the absence of evaluation criteria is a notable concern.

Score Breakdown

Legal Compliance75/100

The tender adheres to standard open procedure requirements and includes a proper CPV code. There are no immediate indications of disputes or regulatory non-compliance. The deadline, while potentially tight, is not explicitly unreasonable without further context on the complexity of the works.

Clarity80/100

The description of the works is clear, outlining the objective of providing a shell for future tenant fit-out. The eligibility requirements are broadly stated but could benefit from more specific technical and financial criteria to guide bidders.

Completeness70/100

Most basic information is present, including title, reference, organization, estimated value, and duration. However, the lack of specific technical capability, financial requirements, and submission details within the AI-extracted requirements section indicates a gap in completeness. The absence of document content summaries is also a drawback.

Missing specific technical capability requirements
Missing specific financial requirements
Fairness85/100

The tender is an open procedure, allowing broad access. The estimated value is disclosed, and the criteria for eligibility are general, suggesting a fair approach. The lack of specific tailored requirements for particular companies is a positive aspect.

Practicality65/100

The tender specifies a contract start date and duration. However, the absence of information regarding e-submission and financing details limits its practicality for potential bidders.

No e-submission specified
No financing information provided
Data Consistency90/100

Key fields such as title, reference, organization, value, and dates are populated. There are no reported disputes or suspensions, and the dates provided are logically sequenced.

Sustainability50/100

The tender does not explicitly mention any green procurement, social aspects, or innovation focus. It is also not indicated as EU funded, which limits its sustainability score.

Not green procurement
No social criteria

Strengths

Clear title, reference, and organization
Disclosed estimated value and duration
Open procedure for broad participation
Logical date sequencing

Concerns

Missing specific technical and financial requirements
Absence of evaluation criteria
Lack of document content summaries
No explicit sustainability or innovation focus

Recommendations

1. Provide detailed technical and financial capability requirements.
2. Specify clear evaluation criteria for bids.
3. Include summaries or content for the tender documents.

AI Scoring Preview

Sign up to view complete requirements and analysis

Complete quality score analysis
Detailed sub-score breakdown
Strengths & concerns insights
Strategic recommendations

No credit card required • Setup in 2 minutes

New Service

Want us to handle this tender?

Our procurement experts prepare everything. Proven to work — you review, approve, and submit.

~1hYour time only
80%+80%+
$0Upfront
See full comparison
Without TaaSWith TaaS
40-80 hrs
Preparation time
~1 hr
Your time only
15-25%
Average win rate
80%+
Win rate
Risk of errors
Manual review
Expert QA
Compliance check
You do all
Handle everything
We do all
End-to-end service
Let's Win This Tender
Pay only when you win · 400+ companies trust us
Or do it yourself

Add to Pipeline